Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933142AbWKMXKC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:10:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933144AbWKMXKB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:10:01 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:17542 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933142AbWKMXKA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:10:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:09:23 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andi Kleen , linux kernel mailing list , Reloc Kernel List , ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, magnus.damm@gmail.com, lwang@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Message-ID: <20061113230923.GD13832@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com References: <20061113162135.GA17429@in.ibm.com> <20061113164314.GK17429@in.ibm.com> <200611131822.44034.ak@suse.de> <20061113230156.GF1701@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061113230156.GF1701@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1445 Lines: 41 On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:01:56AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > - Killed lots of dead code > > > - Improve the cpu sanity checks to verify long mode > > > is enabled when we wake up. > > > - Removed the need for modifying any existing kernel page table. > > > - Moved wakeup_level4_pgt into the wakeup routine so we can > > > run the kernel above 4G. > > > - Increased the size of the wakeup routine to 8K. > > > - Renamed the variables to use the 64bit register names. > > > - Lots of misc cleanups to match trampoline.S > > > > > > I don't have a configuration I can test this but it compiles cleanly > > > and it should work, the code is very similar to the SMP trampoline, > > > which I have tested. At least now the comments about still running in > > > low memory are actually correct. > > > > > > Vivek has tested this patch for suspend to memory and it works fine. > > > > Suspend is unfortunately quite fragile. > > > > pavel, rafael can you please test and review this patch? > > > (full patch is on l-k) > > Based on comments, it looks like there'll be new version of patch, > anyway? Vivek, would you cc me? > Pavel Hi Pavel, Sure I will. Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/