Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933187AbWKMX6H (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:58:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933188AbWKMX6G (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:58:06 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:61633 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933187AbWKMX6E (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:58:04 -0500 From: Neil Brown To: Jurriaan Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:57:57 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17753.1669.983918.956944@cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: trouble with mounting a 1.5 TB raid6 volume in 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 In-Reply-To: message from thunder7@xs4all.nl on Monday November 13 References: <20061111183835.GA3801@amd64.of.nowhere> <17751.64583.924110.954687@cse.unsw.edu.au> <17752.15962.816035.80638@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20061113174341.GA3819@amd64.of.nowhere> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D From: Neil Brown > Date: Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:43:54PM +1100 > > On Monday November 13, neilb@suse.de wrote: > > > > > > Can you try reverting this patch (patch -p1 -R) ? > > > > > > > Yes, I'm confident that reverting that patch will fix your problem. > > I actually found a number of errors while tracking this down :-( > > Oops. Do you have some kind of test-suite to run on md-devices before > releasing a patch? I didn't think my hardware was that exotic. Yes, I have a test suite (part of the mdadm package - anyone can try running it - "make everything ; sh test"). The trouble is that I don't run it as often as I should. I plan to fix that, but it really needs to run automatically to be reliable - I can't be trusted to run it when required. :-( I've taken steps to setting something up to that it does run automagically every night against various kernels, but there is still a way to go... It did catch this raid6 problem when I did run it, but there were a few other bugs in there that the test suite would not have found (e.g. one was a memory leak and checking generically for memory leaks is not trivial). > > I had a scary moment just now, since 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 without your patch > wanted to fsck the volume, and started repairing errors which didn't > exist on disk. Luckily, it stopped before inode 64, and I was able to > fsck the volume on an earlier kernel without apparent damage. > > Still, a test suite seems like a good idea. Also, getting Andrew to > either add this as a hot-fix or release -mm2 would be a good idea, > IMVHO. I'll suggest something when I submit the patches which fix all the bugs I found (test-suite still running just at the moment). NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/