Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp455199pxv; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxpr38/PTbENdd70/HsPvnP4++GORKg09u9zh5FABJhzqUg74Uj30I7572+MlOqfrHldAd X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9690:: with SMTP id hd16mr29366852ejc.251.1625069974229; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625069974; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vg5/VZwUDxGAOf3CainXYP6U3cJbFj+jA4Vhhbo7BaMUr0qLaIhm2Sia4A1fDCoO5q gXKMtMcB3LI/Gv70UBxm6ok3ps6VeDGwdOXAIf9LMYY5T2coqTkQdnZvPLUDk8H5Hqgb 2gX4xX6AndhR/TsBIzsLdqCERZCfS1Ta42/Jclyr7MGXiqQkZR2KybC+pGVtXV6gL31e vYgtlHN0CJnmn2o3+z06nEiUUs2yfiKPKQHdPzRAr2cMMJ3ah0rdBc1CaQ7g7bjLIRf9 XeeLgf0m79c+YlDW3bcmeeQOpiFo+eRlhnxNPZeBj22JsyVfaD/9CHgjsfJqPKmVHW07 7WRA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=HwWdjF8FNXzpIUhi5fnu1MLcxhnnZkyL8lDyfa+uD08=; b=HycBMkHWwW9O10gcsULmPhiAK6d1T1Yl2i2/d9gABkK+91QOe6R8xP9EXJ3emvBwtS 0f8bRNgZCEPhd0+aw0lyJdD9Lfr+MhFy4gYcStkfL885XI048Y8oIFLh9Roe8KYjJBL5 yZje/swo5YE4Ll4IWcBlBDjlo+9D3hiQzo/TjWBiU5I/fDZvDDJ4dQ3LIZMmcT5A9aqB 14Gi+m02/SwagaEhCg+4mLCOuJpzX+Q7y9lHILYiJey+7lzWdhSnz+9sJSbHg6ZuGpjN IAEHTyhOTMgl4+5hjCKUfL7IXf1ttLlqb7v5C6glpdLS0xSDjvH8H4VTQBgytz0T85Eg yGsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=XKk4i7ly; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f8si20366612ejl.652.2021.06.30.09.19.09; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=XKk4i7ly; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229548AbhF3QTq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:19:46 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35922 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229510AbhF3QTp (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:19:45 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 692AF61432; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:17:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1625069836; bh=BeJiROVqlJwZCvSsZGvTEmxYuBXNeR/dJgCXjDEV6yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XKk4i7lyKOxDkmBJWLZTY8mfwCGgSZjDV4zfVsV/12SJZkU88E048GqVwdzhnb3aw 9jd8Gg3v77SyrYSTHAPEOuh7uBIKIOdENG/mxT4lBPZLvltM2bQ4QV9CFMMSxV+noL a5aUUIOPtoSaS6evDvUuC6ksym+zzh0zdmbTH9U+WOfgBXKBnJVyCMMgynRNTaaknb z4am/M8DjJs4ewK/o+ZCCNL4HCdTijKLVr3VLQj9qRQ1dy1uqFbtHzH06g8PQ1uaE2 /INHPZV1ixzOVE75BuMxfc3CxHGtho11a5hMkBg76la57mBThb0D/elezLQ0RpNsHp pL+ysjRJWXEhA== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2847D40B1A; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:17:13 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:17:13 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Alexey Bayduraev Cc: Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Andi Kleen , Adrian Hunter , Alexander Antonov , Alexei Budankov , Riccardo Mancini Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/22] perf record: Introduce thread affinity and mmap masks Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 06:54:40PM +0300, Alexey Bayduraev escreveu: > Introduce affinity and mmap thread masks. Thread affinity mask > defines cpus that a thread is allowed to run on. Thread maps > mask defines mmap data buffers the thread serves to stream > profiling data from. At this point we probably be better off renaming 'struct mmap_cpu_mask' to 'struct cpumask' since it is not only for 'mmap's, right? In fact probably would be better to adopt linux/cpumask.h from the kernel sources, i.e.: typedef struct cpumask { DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, NR_CPUS); } cpumask_t; some more comments below > Acked-by: Andi Kleen > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim > Signed-off-by: Alexey Bayduraev > --- > tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c > index 71efe6573ee7..31b3a515abc1 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c > @@ -87,6 +87,11 @@ struct switch_output { > int cur_file; > }; > > +struct thread_mask { > + struct mmap_cpu_mask maps; > + struct mmap_cpu_mask affinity; > +}; > + > struct record { > struct perf_tool tool; > struct record_opts opts; > @@ -111,6 +116,8 @@ struct record { > unsigned long long samples; > struct mmap_cpu_mask affinity_mask; > unsigned long output_max_size; /* = 0: unlimited */ > + struct thread_mask *thread_masks; > + int nr_threads; can you move 'nr_threads' to before 'thread_masks'? > }; > > static volatile int done; > @@ -2216,6 +2223,55 @@ static int record__parse_affinity(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int > return 0; > } > > +static int record__mmap_cpu_mask_alloc(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, int nr_bits) > +{ > + mask->nbits = nr_bits; > + mask->bits = bitmap_alloc(mask->nbits); > + if (!mask->bits) { > + pr_err("Failed to allocate mmap_cpu mask\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void record__mmap_cpu_mask_free(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask) > +{ > + bitmap_free(mask->bits); > + mask->nbits = 0; Plese use NULL, as 'mask->nbits' is a pointer. > +} > + > +static void record__thread_mask_clear(struct thread_mask *mask) > +{ > + bitmap_zero(mask->maps.bits, mask->maps.nbits); > + bitmap_zero(mask->affinity.bits, mask->affinity.nbits); > +} > + > +static int record__thread_mask_alloc(struct thread_mask *mask, int nr_bits) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = record__mmap_cpu_mask_alloc(&mask->maps, nr_bits); please combine such decl + assign into one line, i.e.: int ret = record__mmap_cpu_mask_alloc(&mask->maps, nr_bits); > + if (ret) { > + mask->affinity.bits = NULL; > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = record__mmap_cpu_mask_alloc(&mask->affinity, nr_bits); > + if (ret) { > + record__mmap_cpu_mask_free(&mask->maps); > + mask->maps.bits = NULL; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void record__thread_mask_free(struct thread_mask *mask) > +{ > + record__mmap_cpu_mask_free(&mask->maps); > + record__mmap_cpu_mask_free(&mask->affinity); > +} > + > static int parse_output_max_size(const struct option *opt, > const char *str, int unset) > { > @@ -2664,6 +2720,70 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = { > > struct option *record_options = __record_options; > > +static void record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus) > +{ > + int c; > + > + for (c = 0; c < cpus->nr; c++) > + set_bit(cpus->map[c], mask->bits); > +} > + > +static int record__alloc_thread_masks(struct record *rec, int nr_threads, int nr_bits) > +{ > + int t, ret; > + > + rec->thread_masks = zalloc(nr_threads * sizeof(*(rec->thread_masks))); > + if (!rec->thread_masks) { > + pr_err("Failed to allocate thread masks\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + for (t = 0; t < nr_threads; t++) { > + ret = record__thread_mask_alloc(&rec->thread_masks[t], nr_bits); Usually when we don't manage to allocate all that we need we go on and free the partially allocated resources. > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + record__thread_mask_clear(&rec->thread_masks[t]); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > +static int record__init_thread_default_masks(struct record *rec, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = record__alloc_thread_masks(rec, 1, cpu__max_cpu()); ditto > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(&rec->thread_masks->maps, cpus); > + > + rec->nr_threads = 1; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int record__init_thread_masks(struct record *rec) > +{ > + struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = rec->evlist->core.cpus; > + > + return record__init_thread_default_masks(rec, cpus); > +} > + > +static int record__fini_thread_masks(struct record *rec) > +{ > + int t; > + > + if (rec->thread_masks) > + for (t = 0; t < rec->nr_threads; t++) > + record__thread_mask_free(&rec->thread_masks[t]); > + > + zfree(&rec->thread_masks); > + > + rec->nr_threads = 0; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv) > { > int err; > @@ -2912,6 +3032,12 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv) > goto out; > } > > + err = record__init_thread_masks(rec); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("record__init_thread_masks failed, error %d\n", err); > + goto out; > + } > + > if (rec->opts.nr_cblocks > nr_cblocks_max) > rec->opts.nr_cblocks = nr_cblocks_max; > pr_debug("nr_cblocks: %d\n", rec->opts.nr_cblocks); > @@ -2930,6 +3056,7 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv) > symbol__exit(); > auxtrace_record__free(rec->itr); > out_opts: > + record__fini_thread_masks(rec); > evlist__close_control(rec->opts.ctl_fd, rec->opts.ctl_fd_ack, &rec->opts.ctl_fd_close); > return err; > } > -- > 2.19.0 > -- - Arnaldo