Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp505640pxv; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyq+xk+3Q1FintqIzq7XgaL20l2Am2XI96woBjVJExdGvtnVpKrGXM6uJuA9IdWgA/WiqMd X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8e13:: with SMTP id e19mr8996831iod.28.1625074220462; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625074220; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FLrl94uLjUE7DzOl3VDtIDu8TGDS9Mp9SmSDcaTaDFLpyFOApE0eHZ0pHIN9Jj/Yq9 HrZE0ivI1D2M1IhNR47rySHA1n1Rn7duUfMKo7Wup74gvlYj0eAFPrTRJ2ieIqMpTdvE x7wqnE15ALA+qCkVUVnknb1bVsCghk0eDJRaYbfXROMzFKrbl5TFChChs09D4w3hETl0 E9CNB3JgfAcFdXVrF7zC66jn03VfPmw41vSyujptPk55EDj+eI3UqkO8Y1Ublrem9DjH aU5Ru5sSe4uixFBmfJQWsYam9IXmsZWIfTvO+ah6UQZY5ZbJmuXKBSAhADIwHbvLYBfG Z4Fw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=85Q2qAWE377hYXrhrYktqAMo9QJIT22Ylr3BasVgubc=; b=Rwrqyirhg+uLiI2i5OckbLNYiOq06E0BxAevjFu+BxR7Cwf9o8kuHrag/LaUFNh9dp r7dlNJtygfTidv8ZRZuG9J3q63Sfk2Orvm5ZL8wn5qwU7V31m+hZT3oGRFXgA8p8lDbn qTpHEdFOwpXo3qdKRmo0aGFAVk3QzwIbrAYMZ27HiufbXSIxQ1H+CAuadln8BDFRnGp8 cxADM1D3c6CPl7M8a9e8nX0uHjawoJsAnQ00GGCEu0XA+zWX2AAck/p0phWB0wx2XDtN ofJwBWgBnwMsf7eZ041NDJtjRNuR4nCoqub5Hpr9Zp6rQoXThOWMaW5IMMaBp2Ee0w2q clEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t17si24576865ilp.132.2021.06.30.10.30.04; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232585AbhF3Rbe (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:31:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:42988 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229573AbhF3Rbd (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:31:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302C36D; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.10.3] (unknown [10.57.10.3]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D4243F718; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Prepare variables for increased precision of EAS estimated energy To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Redpath , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Quentin Perret , Linux PM , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Steven Rostedt , segall@google.com, Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , CCj.Yeh@mediatek.com References: <20210625152603.25960-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20210625152603.25960-2-lukasz.luba@arm.com> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:28:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/30/21 6:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:26 PM Lukasz Luba wrote: >> >> The Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) tries to find best CPU for a waking up >> task. It probes many possibilities and compares the estimated energy values >> for different scenarios. For calculating those energy values it relies on >> Energy Model (EM) data and em_cpu_energy(). The precision which is used in >> EM data is in milli-Watts (or abstract scale), which sometimes is not >> sufficient. In some cases it might happen that two CPUs from different >> Performance Domains (PDs) get the same calculated value for a given task >> placement, but in more precised scale, they might differ. This rounding >> error has to be addressed. This patch prepares EAS code for better >> precision in the coming EM improvements. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba > > If you want me to pick up this series, this patch requires an ACK from > the scheduler maintainers. > It would be great, if you could take it after e.g. Peter ACK it. Peter could you have a look at it, please? In this patch 1/3 we have only variables upgrade. Regards, Lukasz