Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp405890pxv; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 00:25:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuAWclZ9dzg6Qh4/UOPbAF9cJq73Ex/7f85zF+3rBETldLLvZ7NXcUMkmb3hCghmqCI1SZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:10d7:: with SMTP id p23mr51836940edu.74.1625124336813; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:25:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625124336; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lYnEQyuYXv0iT0vW8fwyWXzU2WnREJ2S1m23IfKAZb67EPvRTZDzQ0W/wInByNuXOX EfZ2wdKH+BCuuzz4nnTh7WNHnuOOb4WWC0gITH9tvKTs1Fk3R9+XPl8OEUNiAzUYLF+a cXF0DxuPsbTw1albK1T3oT/3cX+yC2/tz6YL0scAMuOAhHaBz7N6hV38daquwJntr66F 30+W9KxLAC7terPwthWy/5wlAVOepHu0FaqCRVAuyUe0AVx/MKEEq3LzdQ2yfjKOdoUu MKe6PEvx7ETIdPnBXJM0qzmJl2DTxahEZ/LrW8FOT1/pA/Q3DaB+SFfPsZgoGaHV9wJI qahw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=ga4/H+zFc4BIvkIZp/GwacqLCotWEZsIhOfh+7jAZ3s=; b=bro9Dz9zKstbo0oeQ76ZV04fRmGO84FAa3vwjDtJzxdJlMapu6EH2Y/UhcLbdiItW5 Fx1AKrtD4nx05uQkyeOLL2s2d6nbdU2HZc+unfk4u+y5N32yH8XVYzaUQ3u7ThuWuRkS t/ggCjokhjtmhbvHlK4733BiIVtKyzNfPz2HIuD/6S7UPsDMOTED5dkCjVbKINTYD+wT R3986v9aRe+BCxeTmneZ9M/ERCb+K3Dlz425wOzCUFPX0pDodGOuyMzXzrObVIeGLm4b ubFQglrMgYjUcXRJZfks/OkDWTX0PlVPmfFUWOEg6UM4Z3tR/1PQAkZHPBvkQwnlyLqX OqKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=IaI97DW3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n9si23626008edw.373.2021.07.01.00.25.13; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=IaI97DW3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234824AbhGAHXz (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 03:23:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50992 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234807AbhGAHXz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 03:23:55 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34C2C0617A8 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 00:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id p24so7071871ljj.1 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:21:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ga4/H+zFc4BIvkIZp/GwacqLCotWEZsIhOfh+7jAZ3s=; b=IaI97DW3ssIIS+7nQ5kQe8/cemQmh7BCye8Vf2G2Io0KFRMGvpn3hkzbv4E0GNYhAl klR2AaOqqU+FUSziNdA/ipLW79CJGazcHBsd80s/iR0+tiLs3yar5ixRAwrCCH7BUFxV mwR/rL3iszdTDvZjTJDIrKMoqUgj28IFMpYKc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ga4/H+zFc4BIvkIZp/GwacqLCotWEZsIhOfh+7jAZ3s=; b=njKvK7l4kPa9pwG1dywd81iE6lT4EkKuT0Y5LYxnToZv/0kZE5ty0KOkKCqq1Fi5Ww 4w1EOvmUrVAT5OVb8pSlC58g1+pBcjcaWlYnRrBBod4zVTW6hmKWtiuWhpaXZelE2Guq SfveS5qH4C6VbtpVLbDqoc9ddmWpeciofM6/LiRy/aCGZa/pWiM9Le1jMa+M5NY4LlKL Nl5816DkwA61KpIjmOlCi/JevCYrWqysTQsTFTfukuXmPU4R54bOYnXDpy8vQX+21rWb VILsIrz8TM7AQEmEcdQJIyZPFOBGeOHtRx+Lc54n2eT6tpE+p8Dhl9nEFNXCn6LoMaue gNTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320GDTYd6gfwL6ELPZqWLKjzYC7ObTV75E7L4n6c7w2LlIh0Y6Z 1+g4dXfMt/GRf9TR70mTz/xOvnlnBRx0tYfCe7k/8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:32e:: with SMTP id b14mr10809961ljp.251.1625124082895; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:21:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210701065439.2527790-1-hsinyi@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20210701065439.2527790-1-hsinyi@chromium.org> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:21:11 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: Fix fallback behavior for bias_set_combo To: Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Sean Wang , Linus Walleij , zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com, Matthias Brugger , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:55 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > > Some pin doesn't support PUPD register, if it fails and fallbacks with > bias_set_combo case, it will call mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0() to > modify the PUPD pin again. > > Since the general bias set are either PU/PD or PULLSEL/PULLEN, try > bias_set or bias_set_rev1 for this fallback case. > > Fixes: 81bd1579b43e ("pinctrl: mediatek: Fix fallback call path") > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang > --- > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > index 5b3b048725cc8..0cdff487836fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > @@ -926,9 +926,12 @@ int mtk_pinconf_adv_pull_set(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, > if (err) > return err; > } else if (hw->soc->bias_set_combo) { > - err = hw->soc->bias_set_combo(hw, desc, pullup, arg); > - if (err) > - return err; > + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_rev1(hw, desc, pullup); > + if (err) { > + err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set(hw, desc, pullup); > + if (err) > + return err; You don't need to nest this. If mtk_pinconf_bias_set_rev1() succeeds, err would be 0 and the following if blocks would all be skipped. So: err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_rev1(); if (err) err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set(); if (err) return err; Moreover, maybe you should rework the test for hw->soc->bias_set_combo, as it is no longer relevant to the code within the if block? ChenYu > + } > } else { > return -ENOTSUPP; > } > -- > 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek