Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281554AbRKMNXM>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:23:12 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281526AbRKMNWx>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:22:53 -0500
Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:59634 "HELO
	executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S281554AbRKMNWq>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:22:46 -0500
Message-ID: <3BF11EA4.6B1AC755@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:22:44 +0000
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-13smp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Willi =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=FC=DFer?= <wilhelm.nuesser@sap.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance tests 2.4.7 SuSE / Red Hat vs. 2.4.14 (pre8)
In-Reply-To: <3BF11C21.8090809@sap.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> 4) Our conclusion:
> 
> Although we still see some problems with the 2.4.14 based kernel it
> looks really promising for us. A _stable_ increase of a factor of
> 10 in memory critical situations is impressive. Especially since our
> customer tend to steer every system finally into this load region ;-)

Could you please also test the 2.4.9 RH kernel ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/