Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965563AbWKNMwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:52:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965569AbWKNMwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:52:18 -0500 Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.152]:63483 "EHLO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965563AbWKNMwQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:52:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:48:32 +0530 From: Gautham R Shenoy To: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, davej@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, kiran@scalex86.org Subject: [RFC 0/4] Cpu-Hotplug: Use per subsystem hot-cpu mutexes. Message-ID: <20061114121832.GA31787@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: ego@in.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2524 Lines: 64 Hello everyone, Since 2.6.18-something, the community has been bugged by the problem to provide a clean and a stable mechanism to postpone a cpu-hotplug event as lock_cpu_hotplug was badly broken. This is another proposal towards solving that problem. This one is along the lines of the solution provided in kernel/workqueue.c Instead of having a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug, we allow the subsytems to define their own per-subsystem hot cpu mutexes. These would be taken(released) where ever we are currently calling lock_cpu_hotplug(unlock_cpu_hotplug). Also, in the per-subsystem hotcpu callback function,we take this mutex before we handle any pre-cpu-hotplug events and release it once we finish handling the post-cpu-hotplug events. A standard means for doing this has been provided in [PATCH 2/4] and demonstrated in [PATCH 3/4]. The ordering of these per-subsystem mutexes might still prove to be a problem, but hopefully lockdep should help us get out of that muddle. The patch set to be applied against linux-2.6.19-rc5 is as follows: [PATCH 1/4] : Extend notifier_call_chain with an option to specify the number of notifications to be sent and also count the number of notifications actually sent. [PATCH 2/4] : Define events CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE and send out notifications for these in _cpu_up and _cpu_down. This would help us standardise the acquire and release of the subsystem locks in the hotcpu callback functions of these subsystems. [PATCH 3/4] : Eliminate lock_cpu_hotplug from kernel/sched.c. [PATCH 4/4] : In workqueue_cpu_callback function, acquire(release) the workqueue_mutex while handling CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE(CPU_LOCK_RELEASE). If the per-subsystem-locking approach survives the test of time, we can expect a slow phasing out of lock_cpu_hotplug, which has not yet been eliminated in these patches :) Awaiting your feedback. Thanks, gautham. PS: These patches are intended for post 2.6.19, since most of the warnings with respect to cpu_hotplug_locking (including the cpufreq ones) seem to have disappeared in 2.6.19-rc5. -- Gautham R Shenoy Linux Technology Center IBM India. "Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain, because Freedom is priceless!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/