Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281526AbRKMNbW>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:31:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281623AbRKMNbM>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:31:12 -0500
Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:53983 "EHLO
	smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S281526AbRKMNbB>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:31:01 -0500
Message-ID: <816D93CCC927D31188570008C75D1DE106DEA661@dbwdfx1a.wdf.sap-ag.de>
From: "Nuesser, Wilhelm" <wilhelm.nuesser@sap.com>
To: "'arjanv@redhat.com'" <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Performance tests 2.4.7 SuSE / Red Hat vs. 2.4.14 (pre8)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:30:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-SAP: out
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:arjanv@redhat.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. November 2001 14:23
> To: Nuesser, Wilhelm
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Performance tests 2.4.7 SuSE / Red Hat vs. 2.4.14 (pre8)
> 
> 
> 
> > 4) Our conclusion:
> > 
> > Although we still see some problems with the 2.4.14 based kernel it
> > looks really promising for us. A _stable_ increase of a factor of
> > 10 in memory critical situations is impressive. Especially since our
> > customer tend to steer every system finally into this load 
> region ;-)
> 
> Could you please also test the 2.4.9 RH kernel ?
> 

We did this, you know ...

The results were comparable to the 2.4.7 results, at least for the
kernels 2.4.9-[1,6]enterprise.

Best regards
	Willi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/