Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:26:24 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Paul Burton <paulburton@google.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Simplify & fix saved_tgids logic
Message-ID: <20210701142624.44bb4dde@oasis.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <YN4Fpl+dhijItkUP@google.com>
References: <20210630003406.4013668-1-paulburton@google.com>
        <CAJWu+ooRQ6hFtaA4tr3BNs9Btss1yan8taua=VMWMopGmEVhSA@mail.gmail.com>
        <YN38D3dg0fLzL0Ia@google.com>
        <20210701140754.5847a50f@oasis.local.home>
        <YN4Fpl+dhijItkUP@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

[ Added Joe Perches ]

On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:12:54 -0700
Paul Burton <paulburton@google.com> wrote:

> > not to mention, we don't
> > use '//' comments in the kernel, so that would have to be changed.  
> 
> D'oh! Apparently a year away from the kernel melted my internal style
> checker. Interestingly though, checkpatch didn't complain about this as
> I would have expected...

Joe, should the above be added to checkpatch?

I do understand that there are a few cases it's acceptable. Like for
SPDX headers.

-- Steve