Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1274187pxv; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 23:02:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+aKQjwXgPG2+LpTK/9qc4Tmv0QAQMxF5poVRLd5JVXSDcl35u6HnhuzhE9lez8XnTFd3Q X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7212:: with SMTP id dr18mr1099774ejc.552.1625205766524; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 23:02:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625205766; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0I8asX8uwYQl+sMp32Lwz9szSWrq+GCN2y6OGfcDAY/vm6uEGaE9RMe4pTElynM/Bv 2/3zmIqGxSrmnixntMFraE1wfc8zRzk1/RPL0PGc667zs/nEl+TobTRHo3QRPNdap2gW QbD2O3roAYxz/nxThAKV/uRVMoorBBjKEedjDGfQXRI9K58xJ/Ol7EkpSKawwk/rsPe4 uDA9q2aYJMpReNtHpBfN20Q4wiCJhMmiTNOBhkswDdSMCUuv44xnT5JIVn56wjJXAXbP iYgAQt6dWUL3i05wmv7DjFx5tNirX91S+X4ePZF0BJ2BsuQzMw9fq5BzL0RoccLGLPXv xe4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=2wK0sFMdIZyCO2WDDH+HS8h56bpuMmkc9e3XYE6mC5Q=; b=Bp8pDYLHqyzzB6yP4jr1nR1PausFvATdp87FatB8q/iF2V6rLWHn9C3ritl/6pQlnj LBRUcun5TcrUWQo/Ghu+9cCN2WW/6JSVnAGlBA1n5HdI52MauYke7GE4Iq/KgNZgCZLc oIoF1CdXxjnSsyaaJbub3Hb5sM2q1LOb6uwiRlrY5hwy+y72QwNuLjBratOOMlSe1f6w 2aXxmJhQ0Jvm9OlJwDGe4+k0TFfGPCPxwolLdpAeBEFJi1jJ2KUZJoCcaeTdINUGWEv9 gJRsXZHDjdvfVMJb1rvINbc9PCUZ0Mbgb4PAP4Gq7mlFbz6pHx903p4hjIQ9UgqjcK2m RXUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qnmeXfnH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a19si2170615edr.397.2021.07.01.23.02.21; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 23:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qnmeXfnH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230019AbhGBFuU (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 01:50:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38400 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229696AbhGBFuS (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 01:50:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8B2C061762; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id ie21so4007604pjb.0; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:47:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2wK0sFMdIZyCO2WDDH+HS8h56bpuMmkc9e3XYE6mC5Q=; b=qnmeXfnHyTdcxzSWqkrnRdF2V//PUbXbCggyVQvBBlImgYwbIwgnUm6ym34I4xErv2 6MGrB3Tkkm6p0KjJF9w3F82WPl/xLdcPBDWEOSf7XXYL1fGDtOf7VcYxIfdYA5fCvjLk QoFE+LYblZyAosZAA8iP3SbFkuEM7PwYh/B732Bx09daQx1XWvI/TGoXKtdzjXk9Ek/6 2fYEFiur77q5gOOoOE0jypLYycPfkDk/9cWN5hANTuWWLf9Dd/4ffiDEMczborexJZD6 roCtnk7h9y2yZ0czsJi1c8Z3o3kxvc+w93aY7sai88a70paIkVMLRmeuXDBYBs8cL+xw ZVvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2wK0sFMdIZyCO2WDDH+HS8h56bpuMmkc9e3XYE6mC5Q=; b=HQEmUYix4lTb+dv+2jw0qqTiwXbpa4QDaa68+aS3doA8shHK5uwTelWY6NNJKj/cnM epYr15RugblGZSkqE0TPyHu2+yge8ewm3fyJrVDCIOdrhOrm3n4PLKkWq6uFep5JkD36 ZkrPjsez7P7FFcuVIrPqCGfy8NRV2uLeScH9hCHJSwzMy6V7LYs4yBtrmTflhU9gLjcl ZrILjyTGyNM07iLjowv2zSvTUU0MYDjz+lX9JSvSbUMo5AF7EAZhwDy4GcSJX734GLWt QTzdz6WhKW54Cz2KLP9yTDLaOefZjNxLmCfmaN64IG+t4LPcmtTRLaJT0HlSVwCMSeCQ 1a9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533e+Hb7kxa0+wOKk/XWRtSCjq2ny3EHiondGUY3sFTilQeEc4CC jrCToba7Y6QYRrW2EYNmf+A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7e13:: with SMTP id i19mr3237480pjl.23.1625204866789; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:e476:fcd4:d1bf:22a2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s31sm1915055pfg.191.2021.07.01.22.47.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Minchan Kim Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:47:44 -0700 From: Minchan Kim To: Zhaoyang Huang Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Zhaoyang Huang Subject: Re: [patch 108/192] mm: zram: amend SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on zspage_cachep Message-ID: References: <20210630184624.9ca1937310b0dd5ce66b30e7@linux-foundation.org> <20210701015258.BrxjIzdE1%akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:56 PM Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 06:52:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > From: Zhaoyang Huang > > > Subject: mm: zram: amend SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on zspage_cachep > > > > > > Zspage_cachep is found be merged with other kmem cache during test, which > > > is not good for debug things (zs_pool->zspage_cachep present to be another > > > kmem cache in memory dumpfile). It is also neccessary to do so as > > > shrinker has been registered for zspage. > > > > > > Amending this flag can help kernel to calculate SLAB_RECLAIMBLE correctly. > > > > > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1623137297-29685-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com > > > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang > > > Cc: Minchan Kim > > > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > > > > Sorry for the late. I don't think this is correct. > > > > It's true "struct zspage" can be freed by zsmalloc's compaction registerred > > by slab shrinker so tempted to make it SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT. However, it's > > quite limited to work only when objects in the zspage are heavily fragmented. > > Once the compaction is done, zspage are never discardable until objects are > > fragmented again. It means it could hurt other reclaimable slab page reclaiming > > since the zspage slab object pins the page. > IMHO, kmem cache's reclaiming is NOT affected by SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT > . This flag just affects kmem cache merge[1], the slab page's migrate > type[2] and the page's statistics. Actually, zspage's cache DO merged > with others even without SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT currently, which maybe > cause zspage's object will NEVER be discarded.(SLAB_MERGE_SAME > introduce confusions as people believe the cache will merge with > others when it set and vice versa) > > [1] > struct kmem_cache *find_mergeable(size_t size, size_t align, unsigned > long flags, const char *name, void (*ctor)(void *)) > ... > if ((flags & SLAB_MERGE_SAME) != (s->flags & SLAB_MERGE_SAME)) > continue; > > [2] > if (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) > s->allocflags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE; That's the point here. With SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, page allocator try to allocate pages from MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE with belief those objects are easily reclaimable. Say a page has object A, B, C, D and E. A-D are easily reclaimable but E is hard. What happens is VM couldn't reclaim the page in the end due to E even though it already reclaimed A-D. And the such fragmenation could be spread out entire MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE pageblocks over time. That's why I'd like to put zspage into MIGRATE_UNMOVALBE from the beginning since I don't think it's easily reclaimble once compaction is done.