Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1366218pxv; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzF/sIzuYuTF7xcgo1MHmrVxWv2ZZibOl6Bj9j0XogJxETm44kRiYHRTSN6OaNx1y939USg X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f41a:: with SMTP id i26mr1444886iog.162.1625216065280; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625216065; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WpAblpSdWBUxfmuFTw1MeWGneyerYaTsEa3NMs9aaI/gLSiWMxD7DsWMnvSWXrwAK1 F8sA33Q/64dmVN7Fy1x3VMVkYo+1uWC540rcdVfT0GG/N9CgPS36El0sF9RO5/7W8GI/ OHIV5ElwZDeKtleXcU7cZXBKctjmYncQS6EMvkOaVFkgcNZm9edKVTMM1IYS2bJhYDMR 1Z4TvjKx4u5TGkA1hHj4tOlV4iTLuBUCqMemHRPEp4jPX+D0RykIAHVTPGcolLyaWybo fw6uWL32OiRL68kXiQrgvzbbcr+IWnCaFaAgzoXy71QCRAdiRFYbCofFIJbEYH809LQp C/Tw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=7fo1dsClYel2YvivNjSJj7F1ruU53dNFg1GrBi8M0Kw=; b=ez81Yl03J0kBBk9OHYJuaDvwOh66oCIF6eQlK1gAB9xs8h4L7/0SkyDt2H+t1+EEiH m8Gvj/BG+p08EcWkQCY98yV+NwnH+/kERZsfqGX0o2ZPmwcWqyIVsp5l+nDN4c3kN/c0 fKFgEHqGMjQuCYjlHE60SmIGsP6i/FbeBWStO+Rp9XkUmZb1rMDvyIQwU4is06G1egQw NDf79hMr+UbV3kj1nfbJPGhyIFriyvOUFiIF0PU+0M/bvt/CcfDKHkXzW6zo2Mi63xIL C837JJNZg69F5JLQikZ33a0jIIXJL3ewO8dSORYQQgARDraRjO0iQ9olcL9Cbd8Pv7JQ 1hMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n3si2985084ioh.98.2021.07.02.01.54.13; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231185AbhGBIy3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 04:54:29 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:55573 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231184AbhGBIy3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 04:54:29 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10032"; a="294345115" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,316,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="294345115" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2021 01:51:57 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,316,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="559850599" Received: from shao2-debian.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.13.11]) ([10.239.13.11]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2021 01:51:55 -0700 Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:273:2: warning: initialized field overwritten To: Marc Zyngier , kernel test robot Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas References: <202106302037.QmEffgZV-lkp@intel.com> <87fswzy23t.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Rong Chen Message-ID: <001d6fd4-49b1-fe11-73e5-b35808dc6332@intel.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 16:51:54 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87fswzy23t.wl-maz@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/30/21 8:21 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:08:41 +0100, > kernel test robot wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> FYI, the error/warning still remains. > [...] > > I really wish the build bot would stop moaning about this. Overriding > a default when statically initialising a structure is not going away, > and I have no intention to "fix" it any time soon. > > So yes, it remains, and will remain until we get a semantic tool > allowing us to annotate these cases. > > Thanks, > > M. > Hi Marc, Thanks for the feedback, we'll stop report for this commit. Best Regards, Rong Chen