Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1573908pxv; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:07:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzX7d4kjksDwjZZXbR1pPr4qp6l6dFBPbZt1vn/XdJ0G/PR5Tw1Hk7wPRLLlxXWigoB0eRM X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:96a0:: with SMTP id hd32mr5340235ejc.198.1625234835970; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:07:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625234835; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KvLzSY/sHNebqGkmbFjDOgLVPZ1CkXw68OFLf+wRrgIaWSHdRjwiKkL/pYoG7ktnLu C5QltLtHfQFUv0vmP7t0/U0U4fUgZ+TpKXVyZMTucuE0iHoUM+JNQK2+VXYo7LNjlow0 SIiPkETJKSDGTuG7kvzoi9HuxBPZ7ROWtZSa7cMzW/oX8Mm88xM6U+m0TGDh2mSVtxRn 4v3KQvVgExwokEGyu0xRfdIM/JhU0o093IRQMY+TAPMb4Lz+jEqiQgJDRaqtDbEn02SR a+yjOJCxmApM5jAibEKxp+Y1EZ0OcAHjITuR7l3LG+alyPhn6Q0OFIzpWMJrPYvant3H pjQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=ky8y414dICrDdiysWP+GTtjtDAy2sTgvUHfI98gSqfk=; b=XlyC8y8Q463HMZ+O+zp4jX73/fu8YZu593tNkhggoqUFxdnV6qWzjWobNzNS7v5i95 xowflr/AGYkLDGpNZbis5pSGtFtxuRxuVkd6hoPYw1e8R4rG/pA/gbzupsO6CvzgW6oS pSUiLNSUZbWt8XF9yqBiJBoCii83P/nQWEZhgzMdiPCy3ufkUqqAUOnlsn9rgBlnEOem /Ld2wjENPi5wUIXaIfUIAt8LpvzZca0t/J30BYa/HxbuqeBRGiwiL/lYTJTePvbNFVK0 lYlgBwHGPwDtne8NIpSoVMEncPHQYjyp2eoTJ8ho4T1Rn/pJtYOokoVR0GREmTpJuI3N cAZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ia10si3437456ejc.180.2021.07.02.07.06.50; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232877AbhGBOIX (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 10:08:23 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:38847 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232777AbhGBOIW (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 10:08:22 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10033"; a="189118182" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,317,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="189118182" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2021 07:05:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,317,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="482455102" Received: from aubrey-app.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.53.25]) ([10.239.53.25]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2021 07:05:48 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: let BIOS fall back to legacy handling if PRM disabled To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Aubrey Li , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dan Williams References: <1625209430-19934-1-git-send-email-aubrey.li@intel.com> <1625209430-19934-2-git-send-email-aubrey.li@intel.com> From: Aubrey Li Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 22:06:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/2/21 10:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 4:02 PM Aubrey Li wrote: >> >> On 7/2/21 7:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 9:03 AM Aubrey Li wrote: >>>> >>>> Based on _OSC PRM bit, BIOS can choose switch from legacy handling >>>> to using PRM. So if CONFIG_ACPI_PRMT is disabled, this bit should >>>> not be set to let BIOS fall back to the legacy handling (such as SMI). >>>> >>>> Cc: Dan Williams >>>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li >>>> --- >>>> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c >>>> index 60fb6a84..30a3d4a 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c >>>> @@ -303,7 +303,9 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control(void) >>>> >>>> capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT; >>>> capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT; >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PRMT >>>> capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_PRM_SUPPORT; >>>> +#endif >>> >>> What about using if (IS_ENABLED()) instead of #ifdef? >> >> aha, sorry, using if (IS_ENABLED()) is better, will come up with a new version soon. > > No need (see my other reply). > > Thanks! > Okay, thanks Rafael!