Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <7379289718c6826dd1affec5824b749be2aee0a4.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 01/18] perf/core: Use static_call to optimize
 perf_guest_info_callbacks
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, seanjc@google.com,
        vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com,
        joro@8bytes.org, weijiang.yang@intel.com,
        kan.liang@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
        wei.w.wang@intel.com, eranian@google.com, liuxiangdong5@huawei.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        like.xu.linux@gmail.com, Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Date:   Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:00:22 -0700
In-Reply-To: <YN722HIrzc6Z2+oD@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20210622094306.8336-1-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
         <20210622094306.8336-2-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
         <YN722HIrzc6Z2+oD@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.0-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 13:22 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:42:49PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
[]
> > @@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_pebs_aliases, *x86_pmu.pebs_aliases);
> > ??*/
> > ?DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs, *x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs);
> > ?
> > 
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(x86_guest_state, *(perf_guest_cbs->state));
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(x86_guest_get_ip, *(perf_guest_cbs->get_ip));
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(x86_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr, *(perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr));
> > +
> > +void arch_perf_update_guest_cbs(void)
> > +{
> > +	static_call_update(x86_guest_state, (void *)&__static_call_return0);
> > +	static_call_update(x86_guest_get_ip, (void *)&__static_call_return0);
> > +	static_call_update(x86_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr, (void *)&__static_call_return0);
> > +
> > +	if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->state)
> > +		static_call_update(x86_guest_state, perf_guest_cbs->state);
> > +
> > +	if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->get_ip)
> > +		static_call_update(x86_guest_get_ip, perf_guest_cbs->get_ip);
> > +
> > +	if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr)
> > +		static_call_update(x86_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr,
> > +				   perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr);
> > +}
> 
> Coding style wants { } on that last if().

That's just your personal preference.

The coding-style document doesn't require that.

It just says single statement.  It's not the number of
vertical lines or characters required for the statement.

----------------------------------

Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.

.. code-block:: c

	if (condition)
		action();

and

.. code-block:: none

	if (condition)
		do_this();
	else
		do_that();

This does not apply if only one branch of a conditional statement is a single
statement; in the latter case use braces in both branches: