Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <60DF4C75.7020609@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 02 Jul 2021 20:27:17 +0300
From:   Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/PCI: SiS PIRQ router updates
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2106240047560.37803@angie.orcam.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2106240047560.37803@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello Maciej,

24.06.2021 2:38, Maciej W. Rozycki:
>   As we use the generic `sis' infix (capitalised or not) for the SiS85C503
> southbridge I have prepared this small patch series to first make the
> existing SiS program entities use a more specific `sis503' infix, and then
> provide a suitable PIRQ router for the SiS85C497 device.
>
>   Posted as an RFC at this stage as it still has to be verified.
>
>   Nikolai, can you please give it a hit with the extra debug patch as
> requested in my other message?

With
linux-x86-pirq-router-sis85c503.diff applied
linux-x86-pirq-router-sis85c497.diff applied
and DEBUG 1 in arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
here is new log:

https://pastebin.com/n3udQgcq

My feeling is that something went a bit wrong because:

8139too 0000:00:0d.0: can't route interrupt

and

# 8259A.pl
irq 0: 00, edge
irq 1: 00, edge
irq 2: 00, edge
irq 3: 00, edge
irq 4: 00, edge
irq 5: 00, edge
irq 6: 00, edge
irq 7: 00, edge
irq 8: 00, edge
irq 9: 00, edge
irq 10: 00, edge
irq 11: 00, edge
irq 12: 00, edge
irq 13: 00, edge
irq 14: 00, edge
irq 15: 00, edge

Note: I still used 4.14 kernel for this test but your patches applied 
cleanly with no fuzz so I suppose it should be ok.


Thank you,

Regards,
Nikolai


>
>    Maciej
>