Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966627AbWKOBzd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:55:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966626AbWKOBzd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:55:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:56015 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966627AbWKOBzc (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:55:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:55:12 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Jeff Garzik cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda-intel - Disable MSI support by default In-Reply-To: <455A6EBF.7060200@garzik.org> Message-ID: References: <200611150059.kAF0xBTl009796@hera.kernel.org> <455A6EBF.7060200@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2003 Lines: 57 On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > :( Like AHCI, PCI MSI has -always- worked wonderfully for HD audio AFAIK. That "AFAIK" is shorthand for "As Far As I haven't read any of the bug-reports but Know", right? > Is a whitelist patch forthcoming? Probably not. The advantages of MSI aren't all that obvious, and the disadvantages seem to be that it just doesn't work all that well for some people. The fact that it works for MOST people has absolutely zero relevance. We've had too many frigging patches that have apparently been of the "this works for me, I don't care if some other motherboard has problems" kind. See for example: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/7/164 and yes, that HDA MSI _does_ seem to be causing problems. So don't blather about "MSI never causes problems". It's broken. Please stop living in denial. When somebody can actually say what the huge advantages to MSI are that it's worth using when (a) several motherboards are apparently known broken (b) microsoft apparently is of the same opinion and _also_ doesn't use it (c) the old non-MSI code works fine (d) there is apparently no fool-proof way to tell when it works and when it doesn't. then please holler. Btw, I'm not even _interested_ in any advantages unless you also have a solution for (d). Not a "it should work". I want to hear something that is _guaranteed_ to work. Until that point, I will suggest that we always just disable MSI by default, and people who want to use it need to enable it BY HAND. F*ck whitelists. It's better and easier to just NOT USE IT! There are basically zero advantages to using MSI anyway, until you get to big enough systems that you have a system maintainer that can make the decision. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/