Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 5 Jul 2021 12:03:58 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <lars@metafoo.de>, <sre@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
        <letux-kernel@openphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: rn5t618: Add of compatibles for ADC and power
Message-ID: <20210705120358.6bf737f7@aktux>
In-Reply-To: <20210705093129.00005aab@Huawei.com>
References: <20210703084224.31623-1-andreas@kemnade.info>
        <20210703084224.31623-3-andreas@kemnade.info>
        <20210703170405.60828c57@jic23-huawei>
        <YOK2aKYU6TK1GO7H@dell>
        <20210705093129.00005aab@Huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:31:29 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 08:36:08 +0100
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 03 Jul 2021, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >   
> > > On Sat,  3 Jul 2021 10:42:22 +0200
> > > Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> wrote:
> > >     
> > > > This allows having devicetree nodes for the subdevices.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 6 ++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
> > > > index 384acb459427..b916c7471ca3 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
> > > > @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ static const struct mfd_cell rn5t618_cells[] = {
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  static const struct mfd_cell rc5t619_cells[] = {
> > > > -	{ .name = "rn5t618-adc" },
> > > > -	{ .name = "rn5t618-power" },
> > > > +	{ .name = "rn5t618-adc",
> > > > +	  .of_compatible = "ricoh,rc5t619-adc" },    
> > > 
> > > Odd to have a name of 618 and a compatible of 619.  Why?
> > > Definitely deserves a comment if this is necessary for some reason!    
> > 
> > Actually this is the norm.  We have lots of drivers named after the
> > *first* device they supported before expansion.  
> 
> Ah. I'd missed that this cells array is specific to the 5t619, though if
> the driver is the same I'd also expect it to be needed for the 5t618 entry.
> 
Well, yes, it is needed for the 5t618 also. But if I would add it, it
would be untested. And that second shorter array is also used for the
rn5t567 which does not have an ADC, So I we need three arrays there.

Regards,
Andreas