Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S274752AbRKMQ10>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:27:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S275265AbRKMQ1N>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:27:13 -0500
Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:25216 "EHLO ns.caldera.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S274752AbRKMQ1A>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:27:00 -0500
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:26:53 +0100
Message-Id: <200111131626.fADGQrn24822@ns.caldera.de>
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@ns.caldera.de>
To: matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de (Matthias Andree)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.x has finally made it!
X-Newsgroups: caldera.lists.linux.kernel
In-Reply-To: <20011113171836.A14967@emma1.emma.line.org>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.2 (i686))
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <20011113171836.A14967@emma1.emma.line.org> you wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Alastair Stevens wrote:
>
>> For those who haven't seen it yet, Moshe Bar at BYTE.com has revisited his
>> Linux 2.4 vs FreeBSD benchmarks, using 2.4.12 in this case:
>> 
>>  http://www.byte.com/documents/s=1794/byt20011107s0001/1112_moshe.html
>
> Wow. That person is knowledgeable... NOT. Turning off fsync() for mail
> is just as good as piping it to /dev/null. See RFC-1123.

After the last VM article no one expect any clue from him anayway 8)

	Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/