Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 6 Jul 2021 20:14:24 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, balbi@kernel.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        jackp@codeaurora.org, fntoth@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/6] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Update dwc3 TX fifo
 properties
Message-ID: <YOSdgDZH5Uw9Y8yj@kroah.com>
References: <1625218655-14180-1-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org>
 <1625218655-14180-7-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1625218655-14180-7-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 02:37:35AM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Update the tx-fifo-resize property with a better description, while
> adding the tx-fifo-max-num, which is a new parameter allowing
> adjustments for the maximum number of packets the txfifo resizing logic
> can account for while resizing the endpoints.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
> index 41416fb..078fb78 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
> @@ -289,10 +289,21 @@ properties:
>      maximum: 16
>  
>    tx-fifo-resize:
> -    description: Determines if the FIFO *has* to be reallocated
> -    deprecated: true

So this is NOT deprecated?  Are we allowed to "bring back" things people
thought were going away?

thanks,

greg k-h