Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp5626331pxv; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 08:06:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+YGKebnia8xAXpzpqHy6An7K251ouPXU28Jisoac+KUydl5OrEtfrLzyQUYcGFcX0d9aH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9b8d:: with SMTP id dd13mr24685650ejc.168.1625670376324; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 08:06:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625670376; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DI3KBHmaMXr73ngvIepSkm/DuvVnwyST0wINXhJESrcQSsD7k6LtzDpg8sQs+AqbOt X3MLU6pewvHITasQHNtnRhrZQBxjnzuy3HcpB4rJBmt3xOcM77Edd72Ebwh/r6VLbf0F d2V3VzvyUxH/hNHDNwtC9s+hQxEePtXu0S/sW/XpJFSozI5P0ICsZKhgInN2ohCCI4XF oRzc3gOoc/WQD5TnY/UWjd4LBtL2Wk7XYTmY/55GmxFRZXyscaQUmFaEE1S3kIjn+juQ Q3FV+vJHJEcT8HBn9Pg+3J9b03pSomSF+x/YZJ4zHiJDIoP0SBvLo0F4Kf2GwM8MvCkC jBdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=eHhK+hF7hG2BbycThYqvVieZhLe/TSMccRFDZ9AVhpQ=; b=sR2OUMVqv8PjZHoPBQ1y/LmnXsgY+U1fT2MvXro4GZQNZdOVG/95IMMnv4xXnt0Xhj Lq5xYeoeSs6uL9IQx4GSou/QNHWX/wjwuVAey7ssXBetgCbZPkTj5EkOpfoMIX1n06OR W0QNapVb3YhBvhbmWE6SpghwxTX0mUIaCOH6Vi1fA6E++bAXP+FscZ+iFtMRM7KAgCfA 2SayGoASSMSB41dQF6ct5SjkFUp6Gx7iEESf9F5V6PBHus1lGCfbaxA4UNgmj9Kn18or z9UB4XVLDEJYVFAJi52PJKqHdmuG9c5sAewxSg/wRfWP3rPtpL2EUNKZeqLH7vqLXlhS 8c2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24si18087753ejw.232.2021.07.07.08.05.51; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 08:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232208AbhGGPGk (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:06:40 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:52490 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232111AbhGGPGj (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:06:39 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10037"; a="206306841" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,331,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="206306841" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2021 08:02:43 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,331,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="645410434" Received: from msisenb2-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.124.120]) ([10.209.124.120]) by fmsmga006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2021 08:02:43 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] selftests/sgx: Trigger the reclaimer and #PF handler To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210705143652.116125-1-jarkko@kernel.org> <20210705143652.116125-5-jarkko@kernel.org> <715ed555-5044-6fee-1d09-1c4cfa827af3@intel.com> <20210706235016.uucukyrr3ckk57pi@kernel.org> <16505466-e001-c4b0-ec41-5384ddcf194b@intel.com> <20210707091736.6wzemgmtzuegk3uf@kernel.org> From: Reinette Chatre Message-ID: <10664754-7e53-d9d1-f00c-f9dbd4a2d877@intel.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 08:02:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210707091736.6wzemgmtzuegk3uf@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jarkko, On 7/7/2021 2:17 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 05:10:38PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> Hi Jarkko, >> >> On 7/6/2021 4:50 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 11:34:54AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: >>>> Hi Jarkko, >>>> >>>> On 7/5/2021 7:36 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>>>> Create a heap for the test enclave, which has the same size as all >>>>> available Enclave Page Cache (EPC) pages in the system. This will guarantee >>>>> that all test_encl.elf pages *and* SGX Enclave Control Structure (SECS) >>>>> have been swapped out by the page reclaimer during the load time. Actually, >>>>> this adds a bit more stress than that since part of the EPC gets reserved >>>>> for the Version Array (VA) pages. >>>>> >>>>> For each test, the page fault handler gets triggered in two occasions: >>>>> >>>>> - When SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT is performed, SECS gets swapped in by the >>>>> page fault handler. >>>>> - During the execution, each page that is referenced gets swapped in >>>>> by the page fault handler. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If I understand this correctly, all EPC pages are now being consumed during >>>> fixture setup and thus every SGX test, no matter how big or small, now >>>> becomes a stress test of the reclaimer instead of there being a unique >>>> reclaimer test. Since an enclave is set up and torn down for every test this >>>> seems like a significant addition. It also seems like this would impact >>>> future tests of dynamic page addition where not all scenarios could be >>>> tested with all EPC pages already consumed. >>>> >>>> Reinette >>> >>> Re-initializing the test enclave is mandatory thing to do for all tests >>> because it has an internals state. >>> >> >> Right, but not all tests require the same enclave. In kselftest terminology >> I think you are attempting to force all tests to depend on the same test >> fixture. Is it not possible to have a separate "reclaimer" test fixture that >> would build an enclave with a large heap and then have reclaimer tests that >> exercise it by being tests that are specific to this "reclaimer fixture"? >> >> Reinette > > Why add that complexity? > With this change every test is turned into a pseudo reclaimer test without there being any explicit testing (with pass/fail criteria) of reclaimer behavior. This is an expensive addition and reduces the scenarios that the tests can exercise. Reinette