Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:29:01 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>, akpm@osdl.org, ak@suse.de,
       hpa@zytor.com, magnus.damm@gmail.com, lwang@redhat.com,
       dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup
Message-ID: <20061115182901.GD9039@in.ibm.com>
Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
References: <20061113162135.GA17429@in.ibm.com> <20061113164314.GK17429@in.ibm.com> <20061114163002.GB4445@ucw.cz> <m1fyclk8ws.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> <20061114234334.GB3394@elf.ucw.cz> <m1lkmc4o5n.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m1lkmc4o5n.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 869
Lines: 22

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:26:12AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Vivek.  It looks like the patch had whitespace damage sometime in it's
> history.  Do you know what happened to the to make the indentation
> inconsistent?  I'm pretty certain the version I generated didn't have
> that problem.
> 

Hi Eric,

Sorry I did not get that. This patch has been posted twice on mailing list.
First by you and now second time by me. Are you saying that original post
did not had whitespace damage and now second post has got? (May be I 
goofed up while forward porting, though I can't spot the whitespace damage).

Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/