Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:31:06 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzbot+e6d5398a02c516ce5e70@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fcntl: fix potential deadlocks for
 &fown_struct.lock
Message-ID: <YOXIuhma++oMbbiH@kroah.com>
References: <20210707023548.15872-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
 <20210707023548.15872-2-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
 <YOVENb3X/m/pNrYt@kroah.com>
 <14633c3be87286d811263892375f2dfa9a8ed40a.camel@kernel.org>
 <YOWHKk6Nq8bazYjB@kroah.com>
 <4dda1cad6348fced5fcfcb6140186795ed07d948.camel@kernel.org>
 <20210707135129.GA9446@fieldses.org>
 <YOXDBZR2RSfiM+A3@kroah.com>
 <20210707151936.GB9911@fieldses.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210707151936.GB9911@fieldses.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:19:36AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 09:51:29AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 07:40:47AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 12:51 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:44:42AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 08:05 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 10:35:47AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
> > > > > > > > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled());
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If this triggers, you just rebooted the box :(
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Please never do this, either properly handle the problem and return an
> > > > > > > error, or do not check for this.  It is not any type of "fix" at all,
> > > > > > > and at most, a debugging aid while you work on the root problem.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > greg k-h
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Wait, what? Why would testing for irqs being disabled and throwing a
> > > > > > WARN_ON in that case crash the box?
> > > > > 
> > > > > If panic-on-warn is enabled, which is a common setting for systems these
> > > > > days.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, that makes some sense.
> > > 
> > > Wait, I don't get it.
> > > 
> > > How are we supposed to decide when to use WARN, when to use BUG, and
> > > when to panic?  Do we really want to treat them all as equivalent?  And
> > > who exactly is turning on panic-on-warn?
> > 
> > You never use WARN or BUG, unless the system is so messed up that you
> > can not possibly recover from the issue.
> 
> I've heard similar advice for BUG before, but this is the first I've
> heard it for WARN.  Do we have any guidelines for how to choose between
> WARN and BUG?

Never use either :)