Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:15:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:15:34 -0500 Received: from [216.151.155.121] ([216.151.155.121]:43793 "EHLO belphigor.mcnaught.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:15:18 -0500 To: Matthias Andree Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.x has finally made it! In-Reply-To: <20011113171836.A14967@emma1.emma.line.org> <20011113174250.A15774@emma1.emma.line.org> From: Doug McNaught Date: 13 Nov 2001 12:15:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: Matthias Andree's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:42:50 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthias Andree writes: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Doug McNaught wrote: > > > It's a benchmark, lighten up! ;) > > Well, he wanted to benchmark everyday use, and disk latency is also an > issue for everyday use, of course; But it's more a measure of your disk subsystem than your VM efficiency (unless something is badly wrong). > so that's kind of pointless getting > rid of I/O and benchmarking the cache. fsync() efficiency comes into > play and wants to be benchmarked as well. How do you know if your > fsync() syncs what's needed, the whole partition, the partition's meta > data (softupdates!) or the world (all blocks)? A very good point that I hadn't considered. -Doug -- Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees. --T. J. Jackson, 1863 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/