Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:15:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:15:04 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:45066 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:14:56 -0500 Subject: Re: Merge BUG in 2.4.15-pre4 serial.c To: dalecki@evision.ag Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:11:22 +0000 (GMT) Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3BF15A72.793A1BF2@evision-ventures.com> from "Martin Dalecki" at Nov 13, 2001 06:37:54 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Well I still think that the 8 lines can be deleted. Once again my famous > notbook is perfectly __i386__ and doesn't contain any devices served by > serial.c > unless I configure IrDA. Pushing the port numbers artificially behind > doesn't make sense for me and makes some setserial unknown tricks > neccessary Renumbering everyones serial ports by suprise seems to be a 2.5 thing - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/