Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030996AbWKOVE6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:04:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030733AbWKOVE6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:04:58 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.198]:47502 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030996AbWKOVE5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:04:57 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y4PGIhajaHVSSHgioJOZvdYEzHYPgg+iPGzGzFcV+FYHg+C34DICfoiCaVFgtpDcKAdsnj08ymhI8RbNtbQcl4jO37WVuga2wQYTCKmErHXjsolObPfV2zl5L7H5a4WrwAkCWEFOLYmDz1mtf65B+fRhN5u5/uhYL+2wp/uEdDw= Message-ID: <9a8748490611151304i699621a1ub0b432a188c969a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:04:56 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Horst H. von Brand" Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version. Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Adrian Bunk" In-Reply-To: <200611101548.kAAFm4EN004162@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9a8748490611081440u6ba6c541h1038ac1e530e2839@mail.gmail.com> <200611101548.kAAFm4EN004162@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2579 Lines: 51 On 10/11/06, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On 08/11/06, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > There's no shortage of issues that need fixing, but since we keep > > > > merging new stuff, a lot of bugfixing energy gets spend on the new > > > > cool stuff instead of fixing up any other issues we have. > > > > > > but if you do this you just end up with a bigger backlog so that the > > > next one will even be more unstable due to a extreme high change rate. > > > Only if people continue to work on new stuff during the "bug fixing only" > > cycle. If we manage to get everyone focused on bug fixing only for the > > entire cycle the backlog won't be growing (much). > > Sorry, won't work. People working on shiny new toys will just put off > sending in their patches for a cycle, and the usual bugfixers will likewise > just go on doing their stuff. > > > > > Coverity has, as of this writing, identified 728 issues in the current > > > > kernel. Sure, some of those have already been identified as false or > > > > ignorable issues, but many are flagged as actual bugs and still more > > > > are as yet uninspected. > > > > most are mostly false. And the rest is getting looked at. What's the > > > problem? > > > Yes, MANY are false, and I know the rest are getting worked at, I work on > > some myself when time permits. I mentioned it simply as an indicator > > (one amongst many) that we have a lot of known unfixed issues. > > OK, lead by example: Do put off new work and work just on fixing things for > a while. Collect bug reports and make them useful for would-be-fixers. Etc. I try. Unfortunately I don't have nearly as much time as I would like, to work on the kernel, but when I do have time I try to fix bugs. If you look through the mailing list archives you will see that I try to fix bugs/buglets most of the time and I find these by combing through the coverity database, bugzilla, the mailing list, logs of test builds of new kernels etc etc... I don't maintain lists of unfixed bugs. I would love to do so, but I lack the time to do it properly. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/