Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:31:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:30:54 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:59409 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:30:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3BF1651B.D6E05A1E@evision-ventures.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:23:23 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki Reply-To: dalecki@evision.ag X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: dalecki@evision.ag, Russell King , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Merge BUG in 2.4.15-pre4 serial.c In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > Well I still think that the 8 lines can be deleted. Once again my famous > > notbook is perfectly __i386__ and doesn't contain any devices served by > > serial.c > > unless I configure IrDA. Pushing the port numbers artificially behind > > doesn't make sense for me and makes some setserial unknown tricks > > neccessary > > Renumbering everyones serial ports by suprise seems to be a 2.5 thing OK that's an argument to which I fully agree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/