Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: Use kernel x86 cpuid utilities in KVM
 selftests
To:     Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
References: <20210422005626.564163-1-ricarkol@google.com>
 <c4524e4a-55c7-66f9-25d6-d397f11d25a8@redhat.com>
 <YIm7iWxggvoN9riz@google.com>
 <CALMp9eSfpdWF0OROsOqxohxMoFrrY=Gt7FYfB1_31D7no4JYLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <16823e91-5caf-f52e-e0dc-28ebb9a87b47@redhat.com>
 <YOc0BUrL6VMw78nF@google.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <8a4163ee-ac31-60fa-4b8b-f7677ec0fd46@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 19:57:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YOc0BUrL6VMw78nF@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 08/07/21 19:21, Ricardo Koller wrote:
>> I also prefer the kvm-unit-tests implementation, for what it's worth...
>> Let's see what the code looks like?
> I'm not sure I understand the question. You mean: let's see how this
> looks using kvm-unit-tests headers? If that's the case I can work on a
> v3 using kvm-unit-tests.

Yes, exactly.  Thanks!

Paolo