Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:46:10 -0700
From:   Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: Use kernel x86 cpuid utilities in KVM
 selftests
Message-ID: <YOdWAvtk66Rbv9Lk@google.com>
References: <20210422005626.564163-1-ricarkol@google.com>
 <c4524e4a-55c7-66f9-25d6-d397f11d25a8@redhat.com>
 <YIm7iWxggvoN9riz@google.com>
 <CALMp9eSfpdWF0OROsOqxohxMoFrrY=Gt7FYfB1_31D7no4JYLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <16823e91-5caf-f52e-e0dc-28ebb9a87b47@redhat.com>
 <YOc0BUrL6VMw78nF@google.com>
 <8a4163ee-ac31-60fa-4b8b-f7677ec0fd46@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8a4163ee-ac31-60fa-4b8b-f7677ec0fd46@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 07:57:24PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/07/21 19:21, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > > I also prefer the kvm-unit-tests implementation, for what it's worth...
> > > Let's see what the code looks like?
> > I'm not sure I understand the question. You mean: let's see how this
> > looks using kvm-unit-tests headers? If that's the case I can work on a
> > v3 using kvm-unit-tests.
> 
> Yes, exactly.  Thanks!

Cool, will give it a try and send a v3.

Thanks,
Ricardo

> 
> Paolo
>