Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp713199pxv; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 07:24:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhjk+lXKj50O0Op7+Mne4gzlHtvdjj2pT3IvgXFoq0bmlljTdCZDthscrj8nfX+bnnxO/j X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c1d:: with SMTP id ga29mr34441617ejc.284.1625840643713; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 07:24:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625840643; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ykP1B+cSorKj8kQbdXcaIG533INGftDRAAor9Zj0E9LbGaqIVdZ4AZRudVcaFztoFv xFRmaf3B//ht3zBNdLf4A53ePjBMrHectWC84dQpGdIctu95yaKrFvaDMEg6Wf5/tOCn X5qV3dSn1BSE0BjX/des3fBYATMyL9Pu+1hjTFlmtoKy9N3841k9jLoPKi07kQy/ZVhF SQDXM3a7nfwSK/gNdwg15qqORUjN7dSImBbZ19JT75bx7v+o1iBPEUWsRZu9X568TFBL o0VHiGe9swEBPBiD0oJ3Ma5Zt5lnyBu1bWZ+UwNMVTjzgoOsauITjY5s8Sw+TsZ2ra57 U7AA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=R80jkwSRBMdXMIX0M3ux6M8QaLP+0xDfTy88OLoP8qM=; b=Wwzir2Bc/c3oXfDh+3jnnDv+56rBWWTuEgNWaFGPA6LeSQXw0woi+KxumzAxyY5B+x meJlzumJ9+cW77syLJ1D/pNkoEprqxAc2qgAcRtAZu8c4/uH66TjC/30xoIzKIFkyX4k Tlu70IGdsmvnV/yV0unwHPjT/VsUtlU+TW6tFeYm5zmTXIcgc0T67DgOVYEs8KtRVM3D ZwLamgXtWVocgEderk9Qz6H0Wpesa3zN3TLFMoVuGpzSVOn/JG9hjqcCf/ejCCXHFil8 MCoDj5a9go9Guih/pRsPEWr308wwCKToukzaPpslVwVB1AU0MGGkvW3fNysz+33m7d4c hPWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=h2OBH8KD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gb26si8487127ejc.727.2021.07.09.07.23.41; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 07:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=h2OBH8KD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231972AbhGIOYl (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:24:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:34846 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229561AbhGIOYl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:24:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625840517; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R80jkwSRBMdXMIX0M3ux6M8QaLP+0xDfTy88OLoP8qM=; b=h2OBH8KDRHbrCG5SsHpkU3eV5vRInHIHJTd646l3pt11E1+9IHRNoE9V0Kj6+Ex26msm1L KtKQLlVIIlnEIpLtYu4sCCj/nLCIP1IfVZdb1dpYVyYyVx8fAG1iFTW5mMjWui7Pwa1OOR rnWksp+7w+AXYxxYu7qbjhr6l/w9z5s= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-604-Mi1YBWmwOS2HtCIMAe8qEg-1; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 10:21:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Mi1YBWmwOS2HtCIMAe8qEg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C834B343CD; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-12-94.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.94]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE32F60BD8; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 22:21:39 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bug report] iommu_dma_unmap_sg() is very slow then running IO from remote numa node Message-ID: References: <20210709101614.GZ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210709101614.GZ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:16:14AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:38:09PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > I observed that NVMe performance is very bad when running fio on one > > CPU(aarch64) in remote numa node compared with the nvme pci numa node. > > Have you checked the effect of running a memory-heavy process using > memory from node 1 while being executed by CPUs in node 0? 1) aarch64 [root@ampere-mtjade-04 ~]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 0 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 11.511752 GB/sec [root@ampere-mtjade-04 ~]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 1 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 3.084333 GB/sec 2) x86_64[1] [root@hp-dl380g10-01 mingl]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 0 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 4.193927 GB/sec [root@hp-dl380g10-01 mingl]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 1 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 3.553392 GB/sec [1] on this x86_64 machine, IOPS can reach 680K in same fio nvme test Thanks, Ming