Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp781959pxv; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzV4Zl6DQvulyr93Hd2F2iAA5ZTn00o/8feEERjx6l4TIOY1a/1QvV7djhs55vpmuVLrf0x X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3514:: with SMTP id b20mr28524847edd.187.1625846021119; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625846021; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q6CuOtwQSQcZV7hZX0W0cFRWSidQ7grA4pYabAXDDoun1yfHbmB82u6N1eNPzAahGq RcNZRXHgc52iQn6IUSOuThE/LLKe5MAndh9lX6WFE27uFOvL7rxKQq2LvNvoXHo79C+k 2RYRMC90ZFTIyqsH0JyhJk59kYcNnxs9dXTCOt8qirqzHw4+qcwnBmIO0jIbPAwpmuw9 0YuyhNmuzF5tdRXt1D3BIkAUU5dTpS99XvMVSjhan6vnz2GIf2Z+a/k8qna1NbF4enA6 YvbUyjsz0QH0rzgW8C8fKbgLTfWvUS8x/IXYO7EAPzQPc9ThF4Wvuxxpo1LZ1g2aHVvX lEeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=1VK85CjDgO7q1lh2C8SeovkJ7Y5QqbUrbsSNOKI14K4=; b=x2tGMvpD2dySKCue5+GqXpE7PibQQZGTpOIhKjIp06TIfFcmrZ4fnDPEOY80xxRIZc +rWzX3nZ0oZ9i305lyaBfS0Y10gK0JlUVcYj/QQ++aejWN+0+H991WUiLF9S60M1+Vd4 b/FRKrRyOaqVXKt8YVLwx+99W1F3G/KvLEoKqzYOVYXFu5Fgt/m1BYLZWam7sO5PSOpk VFcz/lf7D371Lp4+0HrLiX16eDd3P+c3ilqkHMx2EWM9OF/qdJNok7kEj5BlfQ1jjDd4 PuWbYl5nfm+NeZKBE+LQ9ZAplQHayUI4inT1bwAkaoynccVstdB4U5SKHeh8EBeZ1esI Gm9w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=L+9i85Mp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g17si8914117ejr.586.2021.07.09.08.53.18; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=L+9i85Mp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232363AbhGIPy6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:54:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:50694 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232248AbhGIPy5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:54:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625845933; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1VK85CjDgO7q1lh2C8SeovkJ7Y5QqbUrbsSNOKI14K4=; b=L+9i85MpAowxXjkB72UeqrS2wFUGTGLwIfuPahefUjda+E1pUZKnmo8lwUFhkr68W/bR+j zt8F1RVBxSmHjM9qAjo6FeLOoZPcYX2cCInLhSIvWe9R+/j/t46EKqLpc0ygqzxOy6txIR 6cFortZbUcDauZRca/S3jXaBnVA5Qvs= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-581-dMPqIeeCP1mqw7X3tkpeAQ-1; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 11:52:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dMPqIeeCP1mqw7X3tkpeAQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id e23-20020a1709062497b0290504bafdd58dso1028137ejb.4 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1VK85CjDgO7q1lh2C8SeovkJ7Y5QqbUrbsSNOKI14K4=; b=dCuYf4nSqiKR7waM/J5HWnz7EVFZexpy/1J52eo62zuN/Zs32Grxjpj53U/2MzOQUP OJcIxZrPF1GuhiQzXaYnm3R9MvSWgEFkrEdTmC4LZP71r8dx0Pc+UKMdtKLbTCAeLBDy pkkyAEueIwD4laYdrftz95RArRWLGzuy9nTyvqsFzvvLOgujFiq41kH6gVhFCgxRwXv/ 8z/IluiW+hrXnyR92W7Y0APJYBG2RimcsOS1CgoCH2x68rrybY3umLJ/AFEz1mRF1rV/ s47Hzh7pCBZIhIZpqS0XDyVO0jG4fW36VcucDFmgQ0VF35664/0shqP9DQQqkskoCK7d bsAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xYEpbtbgsq4L1c/CDhO2AOM4KoduNoIZFm+LtqSInY6EzursV ChGqifJG4RwsshnZeHKDEp6NkN6Z9fBmh5r7JbDq9UzbVM6FMbQuy+qmKYWHKo53MX/qL05xIyh qYDSW4SwkXxql5KpzSYDDDAi+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5d05:: with SMTP id g5mr36851526ejt.201.1625845931289; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5d05:: with SMTP id g5mr36851517ejt.201.1625845931147; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm3060934edd.25.2021.07.09.08.52.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Also reload the debug registers before kvm_x86->run() when the host is using them To: Lai Jiangshan , Lai Jiangshan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20210628172632.81029-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> <46e0aaf1-b7cd-288f-e4be-ac59aa04908f@redhat.com> <397a448e-ffa7-3bea-af86-e92fbb273a07@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <01946b5a-9912-3dfb-36f0-031f425432d2@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 17:52:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/07/21 12:05, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > > On 2021/7/9 17:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 09/07/21 05:09, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>> I just noticed that emulation.c fails to emulate with DBn. >>> Is there any problem around it? >> >> Just what you said, it's not easy and the needs are limited.  I >> implemented kvm_vcpu_check_breakpoint because I was interested in >> using hardware breakpoints from gdb, even with unrestricted_guest=0 >> and invalid guest state, but that's it. > > It seems kvm_vcpu_check_breakpoint() handles only for code breakpoint > and doesn't handle for data breakpoints. Correct, there's a comment above the call. But data breakpoint are much harder and relatively less useful. > And no code handles DR7_GD bit when the emulation is not resulted from > vm-exit. (for example, the non-first instruction when kvm emulates > instructions back to back and the instruction accesses to DBn). Good point, that should be fixed too. Paolo