Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1008044pxv; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:56:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpHXf22q0YY4JCuP6qJxhvxavvaWobWluYvaYsUqltFJlQapZlzaD4aJDPKqmDZ7fITlJJ X-Received: by 2002:a02:aa8b:: with SMTP id u11mr28108532jai.43.1625867790533; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:56:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625867790; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uJ1v4nb/adkhaxvJ4Su4YRqWKoutZtJ1J2/11VWqRqCBHgZCrmg1ubXomai/HOOemd xYBwx+JH7OtOy5KmWXs4+Jl/alFJCh59wX2UAxOE2rGVI1AHYSY82apNl4/1E8cWBczU gH8q7UCGzpGpOwN6UrbBNe5unc+b3dT9Lpg4p7DniFujF9hWS/DB1WP6SSHWEYENB7ns XaMBm0TOImhnwYKZhH9O84H/8Bb/+sCPPEL8m7e5ME1uG2QKvZoOZ1j8NRmn6AcUBPeR YKmDa2J3zq7KWU15M04Q/fCuWy0OfFynr6R3DlyP92ulDJs5oc6p+CY/t/4QwgI0qxLM +Viw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=AFruxdILskc9uGrRWkoKUizlJ6dIKyOa/TAEYca5298=; b=ybIoWNlSi5tiKd/ypcOQz15dl2TZPKvytlClrfnX+VXBqQWjudWGyzvuh1BzG0u8g7 QrNxUPU7Q8vhlTBDNufR4sveb+z1y9Ba0MaHY360lebrCmIzB1BEDfnvW0k2OuWirYqf GGCl2oryEYxpSAZtxgKAHixL25sHqaqGZX6imCtzpAk8+68PIeu7fxd68TkiVP90HBHC hpfKTNS7yJQ1X2Q/c6IhMO7SQ8G9sEnSwifqqMqxzG1Oj2Yc/1pmIky2QDU6Ii7/eF4+ ywdD/hXMA2aOgUkXQsQe1ZrY3C+FjzvkCQt+m9pmKYBgmZKhBa7hXXptk2IwXDidkECO sisQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fujYqphm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17si6855363iot.47.2021.07.09.14.56.15; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fujYqphm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229960AbhGIV6b (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 17:58:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48108 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229506AbhGIV6b (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 17:58:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAFEC0613DD for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id 53-20020a9d0eb80000b02904b6c4d33e84so2244620otj.13 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AFruxdILskc9uGrRWkoKUizlJ6dIKyOa/TAEYca5298=; b=fujYqphmsvN1RzATP+6Db9NHhUA2gJAUYzqgDX7Ml645Y3LMFuJTmKEW2I+3gzJ3eE eWn0DWMjgeWxYFRK9Zs2m4DoXvWoAUlvHipLBgIFj4QgUkRd85RFk1rowHP0Fx9Yt1u9 ws+OBYC0tET8Fee3euQtWMGSfQD8NI7RdzCjbQSH5sPLL1ZivrazHadqoFCvROW0P/rP wiAThDsLS9WytgB+scFez/55UVPPYct2QoNAaq4WX5WE+rdaUGdRC++ZkrpJ7b7YSzL4 X05NPINn+ju4kaknmrM5OyJuvAN5H094IxRY4QM0qHwulTAxzjUtn2UPLJosDnpU+JoK GDmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AFruxdILskc9uGrRWkoKUizlJ6dIKyOa/TAEYca5298=; b=fwB9nVauRdSg+DI7BxOCCoG/eQp8QW/6LN9eeIuW3CqMPcnxDcZ23gZDpE7BITa9nW u+sSstrTU4605bEive92cRbsZ+WKXaceZ+Q8x8AAOBTXMRK+Es9dr0wqEt398SyUlAkR mc6bixCX9x7FPygPp7rE8uf+bDCEQyu2tltl/pj5MRekB97ETyhy0zLBtR7Fiwiq9Z8G hzSY3VzTIMRV6lvdULWpJT9lsVV6cDt0K6dmUs1cWMV5Giu9cT8ccZJvtzAfSgUM+pcv JjI6PDOvO6qrRGSRMw2e1sqfsXtJ1qaGNpP40+Ak/ZfKqB8e1nyRxC1wJ9A8/BUAp/bg +QXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531M3+YEw1AqH5iwwG73elsr4vd6a8PfAk6QdlReUba4NIXp5RJw 1z6aWJYJntGIgW2Qdt1wNfATL0L5AeAH/bhr3w20aw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:25cb:: with SMTP id d11mr24646594otu.56.1625867746337; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:55:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1625825111-6604-1-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com> <1625825111-6604-6-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1625825111-6604-6-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com> From: Jim Mattson Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:55:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/13] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for guest Arch LBR To: Yang Weijiang Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, like.xu.linux@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Like Xu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 2:51 AM Yang Weijiang wrot= e: > > From: Like Xu > > Arch LBRs are enabled by setting MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL.LBREn to 1. A new guest > state field named "Guest IA32_LBR_CTL" is added to enhance guest LBR usag= e. > When guest Arch LBR is enabled, a guest LBR event will be created like th= e > model-specific LBR does. Clear guest LBR enable bit on host PMI handling = so > guest can see expected config. > > On processors that support Arch LBR, MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR[bit 0] has no > meaning. It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0. > Like IA32_DEBUGCTL, IA32_ARCH_LBR_CTL msr is also reserved on INIT. I suspect you mean "preserved" rather than "reserved." > Signed-off-by: Like Xu > Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang > --- > arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 2 -- > arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 + > arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 2 ++ > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 9 +++++++++ > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > index da68f0e74702..4500c564c63a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ > #include "pmu.h" > > #define MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT (MSR_IA32_PMC0 - MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0) > +/* > + * Regardless of the Arch LBR or legacy LBR, when the LBR_EN bit 0 of th= e > + * corresponding control MSR is set to 1, LBR recording will be enabled. > + */ Is this comment misplaced? It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the macro being defined below. > @@ -458,6 +467,14 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, = struct msr_data *msr_info) > lbr_desc->records.nr =3D data; > lbr_desc->arch_lbr_reset =3D true; > return 0; > + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL: > + if (data & ~KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK) Is a static mask sufficient? Per the Intel=C2=AE Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features Programming Reference, some of these bits may not be supported on all microarchitectures. See Table 7-8. CPUID Leaf 01CH Enumeration of Architectural LBR Capabilities. > + break; > + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, data); > + if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !lbr_desc->event && > + (data & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN)) > + intel_pmu_create_guest_lbr_event(vcpu); Nothing has to be done when the LBREN bit goes from 1 to 0? > + return 0; > default: > if ((pmc =3D get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) || > (pmc =3D get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) { Per the Intel=C2=AE Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features Programming Reference, "IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn is saved and cleared on #SMI, and restored on RSM." I don't see that happening anywhere. That manual also says, "On a warm reset...IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn is cleared to 0, disabling LBRs." I don't see that happening either. I have a question about section 7.1.4.4 in that manual. It says, "On a debug breakpoint event (#DB), IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn is cleared." When, exactly, does that happen? In particular, if kvm synthesizes such an event (for example, in kvm_vcpu_do_singlestep), does IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn automatically get cleared (after loading the guest IA32_LBR_CTL value from the VMCS)? Or does kvm need to explicitly clear that bit in the VMCS before injecting the #DB?