Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1602211pxv; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:10:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeOhypTt67VTWX7FLdlKPcYUi9Ltus4GbgWBsDLALEHz+iXPqAPKiZO7KFleemLCX05xef X-Received: by 2002:a02:c7c4:: with SMTP id s4mr35897766jao.82.1625933435424; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:10:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625933435; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dq78TCpqgLZz79DXvcuEmEQBJSPaBvw4bRfq7TxYIWHC+2gcuZxzFncdrge5XM3Qhw +JATSnHF0r1Tvh3MmRS4ws8d7rb86Pr6P3Oy4rqEAyYRidyhTfHcyDPwrG+VIylzQ/7s zeiCL6g/I42tl7HAp3VUotyK737TLrSkrHZtUI+GrPDsseDhNwzhG8SOIpGZ2k12uPRV kTF5s1JbuLEuLB4vNu3IFmbtjxtkOznHRqQmYia2at51fyUZdzcU5R2onwMZcICvLvzM /FauJLGGHnynVOsjV/KNJFp8XapRTai0mMgNX+b+DSVb7wJKZxD0XK+qgobqrJwoazoc wUKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=B+ZumVvqvu+0mUwwUiQ31zStVAZut8y1rEf5GPLOqS8=; b=u00TrLbdGx4xw4CuYCsP+KOTioBY76OF7bVlNVxZVExfPtC5IJM+FlwFCM6U3UGAuI ZfRUO89JuDAK9yQ8+nzMKjfi8PCKx+k976IejvjjDxIzlN7w7RNjorXMxxte7vDvYyn7 KScUMSVFbCSPNBeKoYbP3GcySHdpuvexezhSMkTjWulghEbaQ1ui7rTTNlEXAo9sseed UnYbLcCULt3bCLZrv2fmDWkX2NumBMSmLFgHM/EH6mlchcZJR/rJXudTIWf1Z5YuPm+C 4ehGpSAwrvrOPpiqOBTc9FwrAqt7ulNFlzW0fOL2DYUF+LEC2TP6EXTZcmEQFLo2NiL/ SI5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@lechnology.com header.s=default header.b=TSONfkWJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3si7095908iln.124.2021.07.10.09.10.21; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@lechnology.com header.s=default header.b=TSONfkWJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232600AbhGJQLM (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:12 -0400 Received: from vern.gendns.com ([98.142.107.122]:56944 "EHLO vern.gendns.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232286AbhGJQLM (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lechnology.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=B+ZumVvqvu+0mUwwUiQ31zStVAZut8y1rEf5GPLOqS8=; b=TSONfkWJaEHlQg2MvrF2pcumkZ X2DLQGMS4PSWljs2brnP2gi0ctBmbjOb/9SzsWntr5wpJBhLo4NFunu06WXdMIU26C9JAnKzwIO97 rNMl7XI1jQYqNHNDovl9nsmdF8DdA0mPdHSQj3NSMCXXMXXEh//YAh3QrBDc40qFbmYvp8QUq2O3F 7dP+q/ZJqhFvAuT2yf8W2P9UNgn4CxtSsPglFpnB8Sbx4uvyS+SloonH3laoYfqUvWIGb9/XSxYzU pm6Y1ujFt3in4LpPFizU/C1JpmOj/RCHvjS1Fsenek/4grjGYnQwupo+/pxtfwjC+YBquhu9GsofB YLJ/HWqw==; Received: from 108-198-5-147.lightspeed.okcbok.sbcglobal.net ([108.198.5.147]:46002 helo=[192.168.0.134]) by vern.gendns.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m2FWS-00GZ0l-Nv; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:08:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 15/17] counter: Implement events_queue_size sysfs attribute From: David Lechner To: William Breathitt Gray , Jarkko Nikula Cc: jic23@kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, kernel@pengutronix.de, a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com, gwendal@chromium.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, syednwaris@gmail.com, patrick.havelange@essensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@st.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, o.rempel@pengutronix.de References: <1a624011-0b43-ac42-be53-a42f81923e5a@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <76cc7f77-a59c-86ef-8df9-65b877356b32@lechnology.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 11:08:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vern.gendns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lechnology.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vern.gendns.com: authenticated_id: davidmain+lechnology.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Authenticated-Sender: vern.gendns.com: davidmain@lechnology.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/10/21 10:43 AM, David Lechner wrote: > On 7/10/21 5:25 AM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: >>> and after that >>> >>> [   16.564403] ================================================ >>> [   16.570725] WARNING: lock held when returning to user space! >>> [   16.577044] 5.13.0-next-20210706+ #4 Not tainted >>> [   16.582198] ------------------------------------------------ >>> [   16.588507] cat/331 is leaving the kernel with locks still held! >>> [   16.595214] 1 lock held by cat/331: >>> [   16.599103]  #0: ffff888102bb3630 >>> (&counter->chrdev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: counter_chrdev_open+0x21/0x60 >>> [counter] >>> >>> Jarkko >> I'm not sure how to resolve this warning. The purpose of this lock is to >> limit chrdev to a single open at a time. To accomplish this I grab this >> lock in counter_chrdev_open() and hold it until counter_chrdev_release() >> is called. Is there a better way to accomplish this? > > How about using an atomic flag, e.g test_and_set_bit()? Another option could be to rethink it at a higher level and avoid the need for a lock (and sysfs attribute) altogether. For example, would it work to (re)allocate the kfifo buffer in the COUNTER_ENABLE_EVENTS_IOCTL callback and add a parameter to that ioctl to specify the buffer size (with units of events rather than bytes)?