Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp2630944pxv; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:46:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjSUr7KUtPK3IgMwn1V4f5k5l4RI36TDxOjhU9GdlZiBKVHcRX6attM45+TjDbn74Q4oK/ X-Received: by 2002:a92:bf0b:: with SMTP id z11mr37879489ilh.60.1626061607668; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:46:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626061607; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vwDf4SIyNMq1YdsYRSt+2ja66MMSN7v7oJnBh6/qtGC8F/MfT0MQsKsNXHB6Zb0OOR fuBYCXQmF/VuSpVq02iD4wACXOpvVBWb5IERI2ajyTJ98rUb0A16fPF6vhkN9mVkGF34 ULOOUz6Sswx3rAYdWgeWqxj49wf0VJeXyFLuUNsHzJCV39Tn/iBNtV0Kp6oQ7tQiePLs 3UcF8v9sSk6y+MIwZgkAaBmDM102amwHDtasbt9AK3ouIWcZs3z7L9clvIE+HlWNlNT1 uV2I4rpi6MZEhx1/MpK8Rgs297JfcApY1th/qQmAHNG5CakEg8gwaIhjh6K/X9SFVSwn AU9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=L8ABxoOXKbcQzRy9ZMSwc0rHcel/3PapmdQiNjhjtyM=; b=EExv9aHXhtHANNI2YQu2/x5sWToMXm3MPuuQIA0rS8vmLdub2UfWs5IelcV88E52GQ i5M/Z9MztQBKVNSM7EPg0jan78iVgGgkyiR6YyTwAl39aAjDTJoPxLmvTLFzNKB3htl/ OTuLZFWzfQmjGzldw4iyjkEaV+O0kNUsnujT0y6HSqdtktjjPhPC2mevwOhqX2nvaRNw ATME2kEUQITZ0eF3ZsOm40bd8kFOS5j4YHYYvmjFzzl7c59bWBRhzQPyXLykANsdtYTX u0unUW5wWNEuDevnAC/FmGmMnIagS4dQhRXCwZTZXUC6E+4HCrnzaHn+qJRYf/sEts2j gFIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=B4hu6mCh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m6si15657387iol.83.2021.07.11.20.46.35; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=B4hu6mCh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233339AbhGLDsA (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:48:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47550 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232755AbhGLDr7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:47:59 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387C6C0613DD for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id x192so26639897ybe.6 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:45:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L8ABxoOXKbcQzRy9ZMSwc0rHcel/3PapmdQiNjhjtyM=; b=B4hu6mCh97PyyC0CX0GpULhun7wNTh/YyLK6fVp/yoRmNEIb48LQI18vts7fhdPc53 27851wxAL41qLj0Au2accSnJ9eMspcUQrpVAVNer+7aAYsQHfolpe5v/5lYH+m/MlpiQ Eu1ar5nGEjnJWNK1pfWi5/11J4hdFMrKQxiYbgloMfJsEDt/Y5N75Oz1j2sFv7TXdJqc NwIAEOV4AtbjZDyjjJaPv0BdyzFH3vZSQWxuB4rkixXx6TdP+CwawbNFXRh+N8SkWTV+ uUgiCJJZyuaE6bnqZz/ldxusHLctuMSqBD+e9/52wKvl1Rem4eDoOahfBKS/y3i3Mscx d7ww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L8ABxoOXKbcQzRy9ZMSwc0rHcel/3PapmdQiNjhjtyM=; b=LyGz7A3C/72Ltcdv+hNdMchF33BXSspQ5Z+W7Qt2E5etpNBTbpmZI9nYmT6L39KIsc qWJ67Gg6uAxlg5VmHLsv2OzbmDz/UKAe0v/hkn7Ax1EeILSISTgSGbDr3uu1Fpy6/1P/ cdAwaLNsHwtBQsVCpwrfiShcYLqUo6iPDmfOKFAfe6yGXENe0NtTmb03Ok0ZDOVidk4T 8Mp4+cBVOKC2YQ7jf6BlLuaxkmtzeKF0H3aX77+C3lxG/dB+YLYsgtISsNnM8PgbRfYz hfzch17I7ROD/fw/8qMB9halBvzv0UokXiQBzNfMB4BogDD31ylnDCuY+7LR6r+P0UzH WeMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HYRPKfnM7JYK4+eWuG4p68IsNUxvFvcmYQSflqcSfqcIeRXWn r0wFWqHtPBm2uq4C+LlOQ/dYKnzFtDH/4Z0JiK0= X-Received: by 2002:a25:8143:: with SMTP id j3mr62233680ybm.237.1626061511524; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:45:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210709122712.42844-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> <872612b5-b9c6-43aa-a167-1c204d0f1c5a@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: From: zhenguo yao Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:45:00 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] task_work: return -EBUSY when adding same work To: Jens Axboe Cc: oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yaozhenguo@jd.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This issue happens in a stress test of memory UE injection. It has more than once UEs reported to the OS at the same moment in the test. So do_machine_check-->queue_task_work is called many times. mce_kill_me work is added to list many times. When mce_kill_me is add to the list, it becomes the list header and then another mce_kill_me is added to the list before task_work_run is called. The list becomes a dead loop: task->task_works =3D mce_kill_me, mce_kill_me->next =3D mce_kill_me. When the task want to return to user mode and run task_work_run. It becomes a dead loop and never return to user mode and process signal SIGBUS that mce_kill_me sent to him. I fix this by following patch -- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.= c index 22791aa..9333696 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c @@ -1299,7 +1299,9 @@ static void queue_task_work(struct mce *m, int kill_current_task) else current->mce_kill_me.func =3D kill_me_maybe; - task_work_add(current, ¤t->mce_kill_me, TWA_RESUME); + /* Avoid endless loops when task_work_run is running */ + if (READ_ONCE(current->task_works) !=3D ¤t->mce_kill_me) + task_work_add(current, ¤t->mce_kill_me, TWA_RESUME); } -- But I think it is better return an error in task_work_add when same work is added to the list. Similar problem may happen in other scenes. It is hard to debug when it is a seldom issue. Jens Axboe =E4=BA=8E2021=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E5= =91=A8=E4=B8=80 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=8810:44=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > On 7/11/21 8:13 PM, zhenguo yao wrote: > > Yes I hit this condition. The caller is queue_task_work in > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c. > > It is really a BUG. I have submitted another patch to fix it: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/7/9/186. > > That patch seems broken, what happens if mce_kill_me is added already, > but it isn't the first work item in the list? > > -- > Jens Axboe >