Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp2707653pxv; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:22:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybTpFXAQurym2wS4rL1jRwahG+VfFl0x6ABcVOHy9bCmBjMyjVplbfUbQzvvpBFV9F7d2X X-Received: by 2002:a50:fd17:: with SMTP id i23mr17381706eds.270.1626070939233; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:22:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626070939; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IGv/Mr/rkJZSD4utub1HvpxUPm1OChl5eOEoU/SAe/gRrKN79GV2/FEG+DJT1HQ3cP HBdTVLh4smVbqIFW/7NhNtjIU8qjoR6EUIY3VPGlays0e+R0cytkyhJp36aM5HrgW3jC Rb08tJrbcMNJrFqVmjazr5Gkm52dDjlV8uzDt2KCu8DL4Db647NbObI20dbB1nMtibbH VYgOl05Fy6OFa8CdIlsy7s9y8eya0KofIFFcGkY/mgSAiqRVDO8HXDDCUPPknDNNvtW8 75i+6pqnrRl4+UdY1BMsyVANa7hwWxU/YNK44l3h1RCD5VsLMYw1hFBx14qHSEK/fzyi VbPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=zhuLVHyDzzwR63SpgflzGU//0wR+eGbc8R/wxbvNJfM=; b=HaA/DzCoQiSeZnmPGLVLS3C4c5rWo54BBLvLl7o9F24DAKoVwqPpZkD9NfF9eVPfoI 3GgzX9jrXkqqzZOsfNkN1jsDhNwxTSM9eHIJ9qTnd9Nl3JlorWmedp8KphYSdSOiW8lC bu7L8mWCPlpTuwWJPh5XBKwQQegyJoDwXyeXoWgonmehb/O2yv6EBJfk5A3p4bawaWOZ MKBLjBbwMLNVaPnt0hJoNDemkofj2oyvmW9I11ZGTVBAKe2V0OljGh0xYGil5dup4yfH pTlyMWFLzvYr3zI1j2Glou6l46eofSEglKWUazaj7QOc5PN/SKK2C2qP97Mkoc5CfZv8 T4rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=tblD9MRs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jz19si19415350ejb.37.2021.07.11.23.21.56; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=tblD9MRs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233363AbhGLGXz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:23:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37428 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234590AbhGLGWh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:22:37 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6F4C6115C; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 06:19:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626070771; bh=GoeJ6QtsonK8GSez6muOYu6J939okEtS/8qcrZYi8OQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tblD9MRs26cF2UNPqRy1QY8ap0z0BbeK8gmds4kpxhgQrH6VEfFRUerq2pJt5iS18 RS9tuSDPHKmkKuHAz0eIoh2o4eQTRCfTFNoz0unQoWa9I+XadOn6XKB58a2d2IrXMG XLUzuLFxOWwf6eW1ODgiyKE6gWnCXtAGoSydgGzM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Wang Shanker , Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 134/348] block: fix discard request merge Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:08:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20210712060719.040905592@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210712060659.886176320@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210712060659.886176320@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ming Lei [ Upstream commit 2705dfb2094777e405e065105e307074af8965c1 ] ll_new_hw_segment() is reached only in case of single range discard merge, and we don't have max discard segment size limit actually, so it is wrong to run the following check: if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req)) it may be always false since req->nr_phys_segments is initialized as one, and bio's segment count is still 1, blk_rq_get_max_segments(reg) is 1 too. Fix the issue by not doing the check and bypassing the calculation of discard request's nr_phys_segments. Based on analysis from Wang Shanker. Cc: Christoph Hellwig Reported-by: Wang Shanker Signed-off-by: Ming Lei Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210628023312.1903255-1-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- block/blk-merge.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 03959bfe961c..4b022f0c49d2 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -571,10 +571,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_segments(struct request *rq) static inline int ll_new_hw_segment(struct request *req, struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_phys_segs) { - if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req)) + if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(req->q, req, bio) == false) goto no_merge; - if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(req->q, req, bio) == false) + /* discard request merge won't add new segment */ + if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) + return 1; + + if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req)) goto no_merge; /* -- 2.30.2