Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp2711069pxv; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:29:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhJYIC66MxorKDOkwrX6+eZf+BgpOy31cUe+gvKolLsbQ4A2VbauhpquiCEsQRmWdEbyOJ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d5c8:: with SMTP id d8mr18236429eds.165.1626071352810; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:29:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626071352; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lQH9bOF8W33rK2W6KvidE55KqLqHDJdy0t65bzk6TSk0CvcT3ZcDt11pVNb6QMy9ZK KnTSlFfrj23jO/cuejv2ZvscbpCEmNuDYzn+n/HoWB980+u7vebNFLSOhd2uL+xOQAS1 Tl/ahBFCECScGIVih8Gy6QeQWCbnVAWrzKP9LPcokGlKe+km2/NbzGJ8mKz8ZqjUhSwX 5XjmYcWdjLEW4r4V82EnQ1Z7dN1jXIYnLcIQXpjtQA8VWcCKDQJ4ibecfDEOx81MkftV Ht4XPU32fsPVxIATLCbRBCdib4yhEVJlSkHTr8w9Xh4VPHgalzIZcEQVwMn8LEBv0gsk C+Hw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=qcHXi4edzFVD8La74zsArUxg09ESm10wfYQpq0BMeCk=; b=ysFpw6tJso4tCB6NIDVw2tY0uIqiXBOee39rRNhKAahE+95Ft6ed3EmqGcvaC5E6Pc e4TXRlTmwmrX2flzHC2UqJFrr2WyIC0i3Phv7cXsY5jAVR6h9frJuGn9FGxIbwxsTM33 HK1fJxfMcmjQ/lDDborLAwtqpJNfpnNghBnnFnlwXcDY8ToU+lBaIXf9f2BWOQwk0yuS LN29OHxvf93vfNqnaYg7meCMrbOI4uLYo5DRda4EszaVlCuOzPGbd+oW41o1qoBJY1wC HBeGpEJwEnqmwFmhQfPLxUO2hdAqxwatJc+V/iGiFl3R2Km+lbIw5PKFoMKm++5TZycF v10g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=OSKvuTO0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l5si17053716edv.367.2021.07.11.23.28.50; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 23:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=OSKvuTO0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235841AbhGLG3g (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:29:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46810 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235454AbhGLGZZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:25:25 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDCA46101E; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 06:22:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626070957; bh=4E/qEcqkxsBjy7bRkVK+7jytHEax0ZB4VA7wk7np5Vg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OSKvuTO0tP6xRlZs/eUxlrgFYIOU3BJ4QDhI21S6zhXb6IwFC9ORl8LJNmmDBiuHr tau9LiHtgw2WYMeRSCv5AKlOOqlE/0Eu+DZU0zMzAmoSxvB/DtHlVqDIUtlgZbVCMR IvQfUQ5irC/ugWvcIiKPc2a/GIzKZgBX90+u9WbU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Donnefort , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Vincent Guittot , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 170/348] sched/rt: Fix RT utilization tracking during policy change Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:09:14 +0200 Message-Id: <20210712060723.420192543@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210712060659.886176320@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210712060659.886176320@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Vincent Donnefort [ Upstream commit fecfcbc288e9f4923f40fd23ca78a6acdc7fdf6c ] RT keeps track of the utilization on a per-rq basis with the structure avg_rt. This utilization is updated during task_tick_rt(), put_prev_task_rt() and set_next_task_rt(). However, when the current running task changes its policy, set_next_task_rt() which would usually take care of updating the utilization when the rq starts running RT tasks, will not see a such change, leaving the avg_rt structure outdated. When that very same task will be dequeued later, put_prev_task_rt() will then update the utilization, based on a wrong last_update_time, leading to a huge spike in the RT utilization signal. The signal would eventually recover from this issue after few ms. Even if no RT tasks are run, avg_rt is also updated in __update_blocked_others(). But as the CPU capacity depends partly on the avg_rt, this issue has nonetheless a significant impact on the scheduler. Fix this issue by ensuring a load update when a running task changes its policy to RT. Fixes: 371bf427 ("sched/rt: Add rt_rq utilization tracking") Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1624271872-211872-2-git-send-email-vincent.donnefort@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index 5b04bba4500d..2dffb8762e16 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -2221,13 +2221,20 @@ void __init init_sched_rt_class(void) static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { /* - * If we are already running, then there's nothing - * that needs to be done. But if we are not running - * we may need to preempt the current running task. - * If that current running task is also an RT task + * If we are running, update the avg_rt tracking, as the running time + * will now on be accounted into the latter. + */ + if (task_current(rq, p)) { + update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 0); + return; + } + + /* + * If we are not running we may need to preempt the current + * running task. If that current running task is also an RT task * then see if we can move to another run queue. */ - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->rt.overloaded) rt_queue_push_tasks(rq); -- 2.30.2