Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp2784835pxv; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCJFcGDZej3NLR4desnwO8cx4c7JtoQrhjCRjraVTZhO4ACZIa45Mf9jtU7W1j9w9PTjPx X-Received: by 2002:a92:190e:: with SMTP id 14mr34784908ilz.70.1626079229527; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626079229; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bu0HBrnZ9cNCa2t4cLHdxC8Be5frWE6WXDkCHnin86QWq+WhAVo7QdLRif0Sto0R2m 3384Gd15HVROqR7W5YG4dDsthrPvKnj2SrWDVSemhHMpeZjuMVcxRwQmFjq4dJkCCILE /fWrGrWrGZsngUMpi5kscFkLpdJ/YthAlPAkH+hLomRCi/invAtbfSvA5cMr6nsGc0UF OTQ+xurB4YaRs5P/UOmYMI+PaVhQ1zyc+EgHnlx/DcwtSlILdkXILVfKgE/QspqOQJwK glqUK5g4A/2+Q/FyscpQNAdysBc0SXbA36nq140Htc4lAi+iuTpXhj/0RSq0VHM7QGQL JqDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=25uRGjyIuT2+pU4ci3d+O1+NHkNqvq8TVllUcppTGhA=; b=NkpD+dOLJdXxnjATyfN3bcmIooEQWv+Ky5ztG0wIzqILCT72fEa9rhzh9eVUhjJm28 46ZB+7XVEvwxWJXb5C2/uszP6tioWDOjBfJjHlIo1MlpajclGQnYnGjvdkCvXauupvxR EetsdKk/iNEL3OsEWSD4vqArnF3ZouZMHbFOYjYwdFv8lHH1Az4T320mV701fG3O+2ch JVsamBGNYh/O7z3JcQC6Deqp14WZkxawyd5iWbWRkFzJn/GX16fCwLpN3OmNfMlIkZoo QAnz7jP0FfDo02746OAuU65TmQtdvDAQRvWZJ0bGpsIqWA/vBeqjHV8B81eFo6LxLBt1 CVDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="DXsSpZw/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u12si17431965ilm.144.2021.07.12.01.40.17; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="DXsSpZw/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1378086AbhGLIkL (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:40:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46120 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352109AbhGLHw3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 03:52:29 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9356C0613DD; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id v6so4375487lfp.6; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:49:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=25uRGjyIuT2+pU4ci3d+O1+NHkNqvq8TVllUcppTGhA=; b=DXsSpZw/SVeET206aIqWEUuI5vrAknv9FNEY99wh8g9bv/2B8Zn4W1KE57CHRO+kff S7bbpZeJhQPdxd584nvjZh80a/gOzogMrFz/hMwcbpO5SJBxrr+qE3pPW2LrHM8e0Hlg 5+ToQDrPoUsxWC0jHVOWLwN/FXMVUN2RsAsXoUn70fkQmum9gxL6JBnh/9p9/QQqhnCR Cx0ycZaT6fcjnaioOmiLHBb9rqoiEHWpu5Ody+qV96hRO9I1/uymT4j99mgiz5pKALnX u5opKVI87+2Ll7YF6NDUS91GfY9z13YAcVl6HcmrmLKNPo3+gMOsnHnnCqqp65w1fN2N bPLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=25uRGjyIuT2+pU4ci3d+O1+NHkNqvq8TVllUcppTGhA=; b=Y1yEXMGJk71aYiEOS+hKwMer+S4MCSsA/CB1JjbcLHfM/riyTMzH6W/BJJ7v4RvWq7 OX7NKfh4GsTV5ZD0imVDjvLIg9W00205sQ68b1FYUoiJrXiJ4VmooSNdD0a0PK6YgbJ6 jFYZiPWgdigFHwcb9m9GzFBS0KBuTPEGENV1VwSkVxFxgDLujnOVhDumNvLG25YLoY55 pJcBnCTVSM/dOSJc39/c7SG/V4goxHQ6Cz6qU4cSY9sIaL0KV8yvJrCxQRkcTzDyOX5Z TFaqPIw4h1t+Rlwmv4APVVZm6/3lgZEJSzPvpEv5FFImxM9SfO0CXlqjbBvQh+MPAUOa vq+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oaUYqEDm1rbJLMFLIau5oOka/limb8BrwJoWSiXT3bXKDSnFt Zdg2+E7ZJoHzn7JsV1FcvGooxW+2J2hmIXGFnCE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2295:: with SMTP id f21mr29827234lfu.520.1626076179101; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:49:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210711141430.896595-1-sxwjean@me.com> <20210711141430.896595-3-sxwjean@me.com> <93ccb871-7f57-9109-9072-8fc26f3b811c@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <93ccb871-7f57-9109-9072-8fc26f3b811c@redhat.com> From: Xiongwei Song Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:49:12 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] locking/lockdep,doc: Correct the max number of lock classes To: Waiman Long Cc: Xiongwei Song , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, Boqun Feng , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 11:22 PM Waiman Long wrote: > > On 7/11/21 10:14 AM, Xiongwei Song wrote: > > From: Xiongwei Song > > > > The max number of lock classes is 8192. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst > > index 82f36cab61bd..5c2dcec684ff 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst > > @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ Exceeding this number will trigger the following lockdep warning:: > > > > (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(id >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS)) > > > > -By default, MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS is currently set to 8191, and typical > > +By default, MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS is currently set to 8192, and typical > > desktop systems have less than 1,000 lock classes, so this warning > > normally results from lock-class leakage or failure to properly > > initialize locks. These two problems are illustrated below: > > @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ you the number of lock classes currently in use along with the maximum:: > > > > This command produces the following output on a modest system:: > > > > - lock-classes: 748 [max: 8191] > > + lock-classes: 748 [max: 8192] > > > > If the number allocated (748 above) increases continually over time, > > then there is likely a leak. The following command can be used to > > Acked-by: Waiman Long Thanks.