Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp2826318pxv; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDHs/ojHMHVQnJ/k0Vp7TrCG0N2OwFdRMAikD1xHVZx/bV/FrkPh+C6GHnEQw+YLj8Gz7G X-Received: by 2002:a92:a30d:: with SMTP id a13mr38037091ili.236.1626083674025; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:54:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626083674; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZU4PSf7q+wmVXod+XRZFtWJDPRD7XwtVe61L45sVt7/DKQcB5nXe/Zv2lq6ZQ3HkVF QEn32M1WAqbnFjQysjTSMnKg0DwfPon8x/KlwXXPPAQ3wRCkBS0YmQUdiMnbT82EliSp T7D76DyY+ptK9qnC/3V2pwt81TY30jmlE0Y+qzkcDi0H8kDtma19jRFtjMOtOvKIsHNY KHCcxVt5VG+6e7rhZpqag7fFoaq+hvMKBGAWA7Y3GUGhPd5chJCbk4GBXEKojZqvJx8Q 7dyf9qVQy9Z4YetqUPqbvoJuPsTwF6wVWxq7SWzC5M4oQpgZHhVxsynZed73M31bhCmH h/4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=D3Mz/cr48wmLa9kMECK2slRgbIUlx6MplstAVvIE6p4=; b=rQTRLK5m2dCOIWQyXuhh0q3XYFCCY0VW0APyO6oIdkTqB39+VwTFy57u2rN6pipRZw j6IZWx8xDVJd6zauFNq1Rht6BMNtlYwla9YMsDYs0uOFFa48SRvi5ODJvNHuk9YPWUmZ xqgEFt3ST5TTtnxuxsQgRjDDn7qJvl6EiVQdLjiBjFM9r9Pw+q34JJoThfHAdJlhEhI5 /yF4piW+hMFiTZyNTB1sjGJi30cV/1aymUhLTQ7THXHgx8GIFW8TeUMf7HyQplrXUuqn IHSQaUmegY2du+yj1qOCPbE7MqZsPh33PTtW3IaeziGtn2u6GpXkGQwhxg7v5OkmTUv7 sgGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MnLjxzre; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9si18022992ilb.126.2021.07.12.02.54.22; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MnLjxzre; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239345AbhGLGzV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:55:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36538 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238545AbhGLGkU (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 02:40:20 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8FA761004; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 06:37:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626071851; bh=c3SFVdmEk6tJ/l3rcpQazKWLZA/z4lJGSSec1g2FU14=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MnLjxzreh0H5tCbak4f6nIqRRqIY9IOqV6wo98ywlJgYa6Fphze1KOVUgaDzxUpZ6 pDXejsd6UC1afxcnchRj05gvqYeFkP+nRdKgAdsLdHDSssSvKezQf859r1GIu75HvF Z75maaTaUMb3IdPTMsoFdUeO3r+CsOUCUqV/0wzg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Wang Shanker , Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 205/593] block: fix discard request merge Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:06:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20210712060905.546106797@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210712060843.180606720@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210712060843.180606720@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ming Lei [ Upstream commit 2705dfb2094777e405e065105e307074af8965c1 ] ll_new_hw_segment() is reached only in case of single range discard merge, and we don't have max discard segment size limit actually, so it is wrong to run the following check: if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req)) it may be always false since req->nr_phys_segments is initialized as one, and bio's segment count is still 1, blk_rq_get_max_segments(reg) is 1 too. Fix the issue by not doing the check and bypassing the calculation of discard request's nr_phys_segments. Based on analysis from Wang Shanker. Cc: Christoph Hellwig Reported-by: Wang Shanker Signed-off-by: Ming Lei Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210628023312.1903255-1-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- block/blk-merge.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 7cdd56696647..349cd7d3af81 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -552,10 +552,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_segments(struct request *rq) static inline int ll_new_hw_segment(struct request *req, struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_phys_segs) { - if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req)) + if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(req->q, req, bio) == false) goto no_merge; - if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(req->q, req, bio) == false) + /* discard request merge won't add new segment */ + if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) + return 1; + + if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req)) goto no_merge; /* -- 2.30.2