Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp2879910pxv; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:16:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwu990ro3FBVUcPhkqicH0VSEbQRFOPG4tVBvgA7+nIfU5lmflXJZ11jkNiI7x2KOuWetXG X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7151:: with SMTP id z17mr13257807ejj.166.1626088572539; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:16:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626088572; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0T9iwWa+trIusF7MauTt7IKINLSRg1wnojwTq6THrKVGRsApTwoh+aZXSDPgWGrDxm 9z4lYSaCRxs3g/71gQynWDTQvquUyDHaf/8PB/AG8+UUUCMFJsE/x0Ei0GjG4mxTP+aD EvJyEehlDbHpnIrKn0Le91ykvXquhWltNrGeSu0B/VpSSwaduCOqob0JPtr2lkXgMY3Z 9P1PwLjKEgqVy7vptsJvrcjer3sZdcrdg+TXA3cho5QA8up4FobaUBqNnAF7zAwyPaym Qgxu6q1XuWPICqA9rpYYXPHFgJEzsQe4d57qYv0zd89zWudD+A6uLW5W698hn3IP1MZr 6fgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=wgMUbzZN6NLRIQOTNOw4y+NzbYLFyql2B2a6vquP5MI=; b=XzQymYUvZb3oLDTD8jNINy9l/P69qAp2n2fhdQFxGAD/ZDOMkuoOzrmDHPnV6jDmGr 5PSbxc7OlEnqR1UlhyLVT2bGToMmSjbe36K97sXZxJs92ckgVKYIwI/901D9biEf875V II84IJ9uQHt+p/Jxz+sd97np43F004Vipfdw9uQLRaY+nBCqya4ZWMstTbCAhFk7/57u q1Zl+NOqke8F9PtaM8VU76d6r3S/2p3cBKg0VqeMrQk6o3EHktyHGV4K8m0itZ+dEqZ/ y18JbmkE2JjaDYBLy1GpqYvodYkY68Y1WclpLhd+yMPRMvJX2FvsSG0fcCTd/FuvZGwY bnRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ah10si16763374ejc.545.2021.07.12.04.15.45; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233166AbhGLLMz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:12:55 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:11262 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231955AbhGLLMz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:12:55 -0400 Received: from dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GNgrX6KKwz1CJ5j; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:04:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.125] (10.174.178.125) by dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:10:03 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/vmscan: remove misleading setting to sc->priority To: Michal Hocko CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20210710100329.49174-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> <20210710100329.49174-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com> From: Miaohe Lin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:10:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.125] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/7/12 15:24, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sat 10-07-21 18:03:26, Miaohe Lin wrote: >> The priority field of sc is used to control how many pages we should scan >> at once while we always traverse the list to shrink the pages in these >> functions. So these settings are unneeded and misleading. > > I dunno. I agree that priority is not really used as these operate on > page lists but I am not sure this is worth touching. When I investigated the vmscan code, I thought the order here would control the proportion of the pages in the list to shrink. So I prefer to remove these. Thanks a lot for review and reply! > >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin >> --- >> mm/vmscan.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c >> index 6483fe0e2065..fbe53e60b248 100644 >> --- a/mm/vmscan.c >> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c >> @@ -1702,7 +1702,6 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone, >> { >> struct scan_control sc = { >> .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL, >> - .priority = DEF_PRIORITY, >> .may_unmap = 1, >> }; >> struct reclaim_stat stat; >> @@ -2327,7 +2326,6 @@ unsigned long reclaim_pages(struct list_head *page_list) >> unsigned int noreclaim_flag; >> struct scan_control sc = { >> .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL, >> - .priority = DEF_PRIORITY, >> .may_writepage = 1, >> .may_unmap = 1, >> .may_swap = 1, >> -- >> 2.23.0 >