Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:13:10 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        kernel@pengutronix.de, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/cio: Make struct css_driver::remove return
 void
Message-ID: <YOwx1lZxLPIRQIJn@osiris>
References: <20210706154803.1631813-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
 <20210706154803.1631813-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
 <87zguzfn8e.fsf@redhat.com>
 <20210706160543.3qfekhzalwsrtahv@pengutronix.de>
 <ccc9c098-504d-4fd4-43a9-ccb3fa2a2232@linux.ibm.com>
 <20210707143431.g2wigjypoah4nrlz@pengutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210707143431.g2wigjypoah4nrlz@pengutronix.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hello Vineeth,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Vineeth Vijayan wrote:
> > Thank you. I will use the modified description. This will be picked up by
> > Vasily/Heiko to the s390-tree.
> > 
> > Also Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > One question, is this patchset supposed to have 4 patches ? Are we missing
> > one ?
> 
> Yes, the fourth patch[1] has the following shortstat:
> 
> 	80 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-)
> 
> and the affected files are distributed over the whole source tree.
> 
> Given that this fourth patch is the actual motivation for the first
> three, and I'd like to get this in during the next merge window, I would
> prefer if these patches were taken together. (Well unless the first
> three make it into 5.14-rc1 of course.)
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210706154803.1631813-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/

In this case I think Greg should pick up all four patches.

FWIW: it's usually also not very helpful to cc people only on parts of
a patch series and let them figure out the bigger picture.