Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:14:35 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] perf env: Set flag for kernel is 64-bit mode
Message-ID: <YOyGi9Zdrio7OmBX@kernel.org>
References: <20210711104105.505728-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <20210711104105.505728-11-leo.yan@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210711104105.505728-11-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

Em Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 06:41:04PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> It's useful to know that the kernel is running in 32-bit or 64-bit
> mode.  E.g. We can decide if perf tool is running in compat mode
> from this info.
> 
> This patch adds a global variable "kernel_is_64_bit", it's initialized
> when a session setups environment, its value is decided by checking the
> architecture string.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/env.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/env.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c
> index ebc5e9ad35db..345635a2e842 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  
> +int kernel_is_64_bit;
>  struct perf_env perf_env;

Why can't this be in 'struct perf_env'?

- Arnaldo
  
>  #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> @@ -172,6 +173,19 @@ static void perf_env__purge_bpf(struct perf_env *env __maybe_unused)
>  }
>  #endif // HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
>  
> +static void perf_env__init_kernel_mode(struct perf_env *env)
> +{
> +	const char *arch = perf_env__raw_arch(env);
> +
> +	if (!strncmp(arch, "x86_64", 6) || !strncmp(arch, "aarch64", 7) ||
> +	    !strncmp(arch, "arm64", 5) || !strncmp(arch, "mips64", 6) ||
> +	    !strncmp(arch, "parisc64", 8) || !strncmp(arch, "riscv64", 7) ||
> +	    !strncmp(arch, "s390x", 5) || !strncmp(arch, "sparc64", 7))
> +		kernel_is_64_bit = 1;
> +	else
> +		kernel_is_64_bit = 0;
> +}
> +
>  void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -217,13 +231,14 @@ void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env)
>  	zfree(&env->hybrid_cpc_nodes);
>  }
>  
> -void perf_env__init(struct perf_env *env __maybe_unused)
> +void perf_env__init(struct perf_env *env)
>  {
>  #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
>  	env->bpf_progs.infos = RB_ROOT;
>  	env->bpf_progs.btfs = RB_ROOT;
>  	init_rwsem(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
>  #endif
> +	perf_env__init_kernel_mode(env);
>  }
>  
>  int perf_env__set_cmdline(struct perf_env *env, int argc, const char *argv[])
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h
> index 6824a7423a2d..cc989ff49740 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/env.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ enum perf_compress_type {
>  struct bpf_prog_info_node;
>  struct btf_node;
>  
> +extern int kernel_is_64_bit;
>  extern struct perf_env perf_env;
>  
>  void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo