Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:46:02 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] perf auxtrace: Add
 compat_auxtrace_mmap__{read_head|write_tail}
Message-ID: <20210713154602.GD748506@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
References: <20210711104105.505728-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <20210711104105.505728-12-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <20210712144410.GE22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210712144410.GE22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Russell,

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:44:11PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 06:41:05PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > When perf runs in compat mode (kernel in 64-bit mode and the perf is in
> > 32-bit mode), the 64-bit value atomicity in the user space cannot be
> > assured, E.g. on some architectures, the 64-bit value accessing is split
> > into two instructions, one is for the low 32-bit word accessing and
> > another is for the high 32-bit word.
> 
> Does this apply to 32-bit ARM code on aarch64? I would not have thought
> it would, as the structure member is a __u64 and
> compat_auxtrace_mmap__read_head() doesn't seem to be marking anything
> as packed, so the compiler _should_ be able to use a LDRD instruction
> to load the value.

I think essentially your question is relevant to the memory model.
For 32-bit Arm application on aarch64, in the Armv8 architecture
reference manual ARM DDI 0487F.c, chapter "E2.2.1
Requirements for single-copy atomicity" describes:

"LDM, LDC, LDRD, STM, STC, STRD, PUSH, POP, RFE, SRS, VLDM, VLDR, VSTM,
and VSTR instructions are executed as a sequence of word-aligned word
accesses. Each 32-bit word access is guaranteed to be single-copy
atomic. The architecture does not require subsequences of two or more
word accesses from the sequence to be single-copy atomic."

So I think LDRD/STRD instruction cannot promise the atomicity for
loading or storing two words in 32-bit Arm.

And another thought is the functions compat_auxtrace_mmap__read_head()
is a general function, I avoid to write it with any architecture
specific instructions.

> Is this a problem noticed on non-ARM architectures?

No, actually we just concluded the potential issue based on the analysis
for the weak memory model.

Thanks,
Leo