Received: by 2002:a9a:4c47:0:b029:116:c383:538 with SMTP id u7csp822502lko; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNR84hk7JOs5jUOhBQe4Oh2kCoLaDCyJ5p7/jdEHn1vdkVMi9nOJHLzrkbnFmuBjTHGbAQ X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d512:: with SMTP id e18mr4089028iom.149.1626198803615; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626198803; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A0vQ5dkVH7AHIqr+qYdFypv/rARyPyN986QTfPPf5QglciaUMfnrTbknVMrOG1MvO0 6D650/7sSUKlapUMtYSQWwlHQCLOiRQUPSIeJT4z2A+OSF8DUyFEDJdeI2wN15vzCrXI gb7goRxOBb2gk9OpQWWQIwer8STn9/7F53WdQM67mSvlcCaSupP2LS+dtXv2VLJbSouw VMlUYXzalvb1IX6vFQlHZiHGMSIUGV4XcY3+sHsaf9XM4uFe1gqrMMa4RpuhiplN6qwo 9LcqMM8JrFNAlbOaPCcQwl0ivGu9ofLNVy7jySqA1oRpbvV/zobotz+FV3NFGt6hZ4Ds baYw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=wlezQoOQ0M5FeS03dbBv85zEglVd0CUhxbe6NqkZh3w=; b=niN3DDj0bXhzWGQKxziP40HqlbHCkZRAzT819E1xnXPlA8SMB3lyBmLzBgtPVWAUuj U83+zToNKT6XON0vrLR7XiQVUVD74aFc4ZA/IfvYK+ypYdLbnDM8dnhOejYKZ2zx+e+d GaBtZ6Je4pmqkrJAk4XJOt6hCj4EJpYIwq4YkpnZh8lMtT1gEHi4BxCqeb+82nKKMTVQ WdIGzMpqr+LZlu1OYZUKOsthz3bbefrN1YOcAnBh/L0BfShP2EO3fpa/oVCdFM+h/7z7 lcGa5QjlXyIraSNlOPgBV8mbv03ZF30UVh71H3Yj722EcrqA8cDDLcCHOOACFmLJcjMU Y7WQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q26si20268616ioh.29.2021.07.13.10.53.10; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229771AbhGMRys (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:54:48 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:48302 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229585AbhGMRys (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:54:48 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C7B1FB; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.79.213]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94EA03F7D8; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:50:58 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: James Morse , Xiongfeng Wang Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cacheinfo: clear cache_leaves(cpu) in free_cache_attributes() Message-ID: <20210713175058.ckpxk7jtqdcr5mh2@bogus> References: <1626148058-55230-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> <20210713113315.thsvrvqvqptc7hje@bogus> <303cd2bf-7142-6ec9-548a-afe7f6e5ca8f@huawei.com> <20210713132612.gvx7xpdp3tjcmxxu@bogus> <20210713174818.oipjwqldkf3jlzih@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210713174818.oipjwqldkf3jlzih@bogus> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, I managed to accidentally delete 'o' in .com from James email id earlier with my fat fingers I guess. On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:48:18PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:38:15PM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > Hello, > > > > [...] > > > If you like. If there is nothing broken its hard to care. > > I guess this helps people doing backports. > > > > Thanks James, indeed I was trying to avoid unnecessary backport. > > Xiongfeng, > > Please don't add any fixes and post the patch with my Reviewed-by, we can > then ask Greg to pick. I am fine with the patch as is, it is nice to have > as it ensures teardown is more complete but it doesn't fix anything > in upstream or stable trees. > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep -- Regards, Sudeep