Received: by 2002:a9a:4c47:0:b029:116:c383:538 with SMTP id u7csp1177329lko; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:52:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxe1OTXrcZYPPVglJEs07OD8G9IIsDxQo+Jmupoj9Q+8JfYuZA1hANpvmgY73kqiw5HHo2 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:111a:: with SMTP id u26mr9590531edv.260.1626227566853; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:52:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626227566; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iUl9mpghYkT1ONU2b0Qqn+tmyW2piLEiMopdZb/nYSNjOZxoUiCumycmRtL68YSoZ5 cOBW2p7LUzjDHNr1lRiwwX8PZyGN4ULfq4L6NrcSIV8Gp3rXOUYOWN3S9RIQOGTqsRnv ooFvL808NvxDPxsPK1FbVyouyrCXZgi6vBrsKJCn4YIr82Cta08fWdKLdSWqOWys60wk +1Udabaw8W4R1CjhQX2tZOXius6INas77ggfm3cr23d+rJgKmnGnIRI6TTZmWqDb8bGu GQl2cEeaMQ5ub5n8QOeDB77Jqbno101yT5XRkB7VmHuW7kuYvcvW2V46mVNNk+TD7nWv OGLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=3vocZUtzvUwPPE84ENWMDqA9sNUZI+kapJwOlBmd3fQ=; b=Kyi4YhsAkpGd/OjiiaIU+4mEkrGfESB1tR3WQD/8C6Vht89EDu9vsLfeq4FMZGwy7J xqvknacipFXO0QTmrzCH9Tfz0E0MyAxI6UG0L0NVwFNMdm4LAp65/YRtYmchxbJvo2d9 ibkmDcejEO1Zh/jVVzLKIPOcU+nGb1FZpyVVUvnktNmuRoK5FJdt0z6R9XPsMI819rDb N60c8c08+tuy/A2ofrPT84aMd177ChoHpNDQL5QYGk3tzVWQRRcoXtV/GaAUtVmmkbnE 0IhLibdqfIDuoxW2v/Y2UtShPTlkc6PsMOLssYwqgwPMPm0UoyAJlHhFM2nnPN4eHXfv h8sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ze15si691866ejb.147.2021.07.13.18.52.23; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237339AbhGNByR (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:54:17 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:11272 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237295AbhGNByQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:54:16 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GPgLy72Q6z1CJHc; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:45:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:51:24 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.112.125) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:51:23 +0800 From: Chen Wandun To: , , , , CC: , , , Hulk Robot Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix wrong behavior in vread Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:59:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20210714015959.3204871-1-chenwandun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.112.125] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org commit f608788cd2d6 ("mm/vmalloc: use rb_tree instead of list for vread() lookups") use rb_tree instread of list to speed up lookup, but function __find_vmap_area is try to find a vmap_area that include target address, if target address is smaller than the leftmost node in vmap_area_root, it will return NULL, then vread will read nothing. This behavior is different from the primitive semantics. The correct way is find the first vmap_are that bigger than target addr, that is what function find_vmap_area_exceed_addr does. Fixes: f608788cd2d6 ("mm/vmalloc: use rb_tree instead of list for vread() lookups") Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun --- mm/vmalloc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index d5cd52805149..47c3a551b6dc 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -787,6 +787,28 @@ unsigned long vmalloc_nr_pages(void) return atomic_long_read(&nr_vmalloc_pages); } +static struct vmap_area *find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(unsigned long addr) +{ + struct vmap_area *va = NULL; + struct rb_node *n = vmap_area_root.rb_node; + + while (n) { + struct vmap_area *tmp; + + tmp = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node); + if (tmp->va_end > addr) { + va = tmp; + if (tmp->va_start <= addr) + break; + + n = n->rb_left; + } else + n = n->rb_right; + } + + return va; +} + static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr) { struct rb_node *n = vmap_area_root.rb_node; @@ -3267,9 +3289,14 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count) count = -(unsigned long) addr; spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock); - va = __find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr); + va = find_vmap_area_exceed_addr((unsigned long)addr); if (!va) goto finished; + + /* no intersects with alive vmap_area */ + if ((unsigned long)addr + count <= va->va_start) + goto finished; + list_for_each_entry_from(va, &vmap_area_list, list) { if (!count) break; -- 2.25.1