Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:49:24 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>,
        Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@metux.net>,
        Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QEMU'S CIRRUS DEVICE" 
        <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: virtio: mmio: Add support for device
 subnode
Message-ID: <20210714021924.uob5wrasipzhbyrj@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1626173013.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <aa4bf68fdd13b885a6dc1b98f88834916d51d97d.1626173013.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <CAL_Jsq+SiE+ciZfASHKUfLU1YMPfB43YmSciT_+gQHvL99_wUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210713151917.zouwfckidnjxvohn@vireshk-i7>
 <CAL_JsqL9255n5RT=Gq_uru7rEP0bSVcyfXEPRY4F0M4S2HPvTA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqL9255n5RT=Gq_uru7rEP0bSVcyfXEPRY4F0M4S2HPvTA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 13-07-21, 13:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > We already do this for linux-event-codes.h and so I thought it is the
> > right way of doing it :)
> 
> Humm, maybe it's okay. Please double check then...
> 
> > Else we can create a new copy, which will be a mess, or use hardcoded
> > values.
> 
> Though you may not need the header based on what Arnd and I have suggested.

Yeah, we may not need it at all. New node or not, reg property will
get converted to a compatible anyway..

Thanks.

-- 
viresh