Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp154922pxv; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:32:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz08YY0Gi1EQg2+FDZi3hH8kiDM4GJFjk/xxEeDHzFP0jufZZlYmKF0tcr9dvaHZ5AOY1bG X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c804:: with SMTP id a4mr11713445edt.294.1626247932138; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:32:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626247932; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h70KG7SbrBjCaJvyUK9JUjefi4JY4peJ2fLJq1wXv6LKqOIe+OKoclTte8XTICD1QY jtWtbn0BtKy/8NPMKyUpxq1wWjAkxQ7Cpb0YhZQY9XjWwm/UrZTSTGDBdB9k9ZozKT6Y w4Kii4M1ti9ZixqTfDrtCRXgzj9iqRDiatL4Uw+clWi/GHjDg6oNOub6pTNTSfuCBapr AaCVMH4e37wB02s4XCnqWYxeeqMv6IpN7lSI9L2as7qObJbex8zfzif+Au74U/HGYarz r+qm0RtX0uvvUB2tVZa4MQiAEAiJGzEun42vzqGG5TM8qOSpYcOJm6MiA15ezHdsVPvR pMTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter:sender:dkim-signature; bh=DX9yJS7o2bMpb1CVVFubNUZ/3BTXvh7wF2HsyAzhV4E=; b=MoAS6YTrrb+alwGXZNwNFvIOoPDCoQoZ3xczvB7D0LFXs78+ZNYJpnjzV3uRQaUHvV F0+JhOiFgaHKHNktel7HoH4kjBbA7gpRSK30rj2/NsSTSO2gFyc1aEMqq9/uz2NB1a4X wBLh5/m1IBoyrXVXLp057vUVTJyhULR2roUNijXvhIOEZWeScPaumGJ00dduRW5xwSeU v99EgnAm5Z7z9s0DeARpi7tg/Li+aRu+lsbjSsfQJ9uaBjXLgNB6aEh10tYXglrsJsEc PcL1DhtCUuxR2VQc1JKtmuUf3/JIas+oPfoDMLjNrk1ua84kBb1VRY0PE6wt2ZwcCktN E9IA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=lvUg0YUm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d2si1661727ejr.606.2021.07.14.00.31.49; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=lvUg0YUm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238319AbhGNHdY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 03:33:24 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:32139 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238316AbhGNHdX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 03:33:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1626247832; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=DX9yJS7o2bMpb1CVVFubNUZ/3BTXvh7wF2HsyAzhV4E=; b=lvUg0YUmL+9r+drxD7ex7pXhYmGJbIOUtQCEu/jcY8VufN2HZ2YeTDX+9oD/msh93+eDxMeE SEnMK089wh3wViDm23u98v/AM0eB6CXOozZRLWvnsJPPyOZZmq84m9o7K6uXQipaWc1cCtso O0GDeAdFBa/WO0WEtcXJmFu+vH8= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n03.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 60ee9282f98d4ac755a8c676 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:30:10 GMT Sender: wcheng=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A6755C433D3; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:30:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_FAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [10.110.2.227] (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wcheng) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B67EC433F1; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:30:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7B67EC433F1 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=wcheng@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/6] usb: dwc3: Resize TX FIFOs to meet EP bursting requirements To: Felipe Balbi , Thinh Nguyen , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "agross@kernel.org" , "bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "frowand.list@gmail.com" Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "jackp@codeaurora.org" References: <1625908395-5498-1-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org> <1625908395-5498-4-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org> <87czrmzjym.fsf@kernel.org> <877dhtz9de.fsf@kernel.org> From: Wesley Cheng Message-ID: <6bc35b95-8386-1a6b-46dd-f33035e6dee5@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:30:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <877dhtz9de.fsf@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/13/2021 11:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Thinh Nguyen writes: >>> Thinh Nguyen writes: >>>> Wesley Cheng wrote: >>>>> Some devices have USB compositions which may require multiple endpoints >>>>> that support EP bursting. HW defined TX FIFO sizes may not always be >>>>> sufficient for these compositions. By utilizing flexible TX FIFO >>>>> allocation, this allows for endpoints to request the required FIFO depth to >>>>> achieve higher bandwidth. With some higher bMaxBurst configurations, using >>>>> a larger TX FIFO size results in better TX throughput. >>>>> >>>>> By introducing the check_config() callback, the resizing logic can fetch >>>>> the maximum number of endpoints used in the USB composition (can contain >>>>> multiple configurations), which helps ensure that the resizing logic can >>>>> fulfill the configuration(s), or return an error to the gadget layer >>>>> otherwise during bind time. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 15 +++ >>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 16 ++++ >>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c | 2 + >>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 4 files changed, 265 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c >>>>> index ba74ad7..b194aecd 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c >>>>> @@ -1267,6 +1267,7 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>> u8 rx_max_burst_prd; >>>>> u8 tx_thr_num_pkt_prd; >>>>> u8 tx_max_burst_prd; >>>>> + u8 tx_fifo_resize_max_num; >>>>> const char *usb_psy_name; >>>>> int ret; >>>>> >>>>> @@ -1282,6 +1283,13 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>> */ >>>>> hird_threshold = 12; >>>>> >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * default to a TXFIFO size large enough to fit 6 max packets. This >>>>> + * allows for systems with larger bus latencies to have some headroom >>>>> + * for endpoints that have a large bMaxBurst value. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + tx_fifo_resize_max_num = 6; >>>>> + >>>>> dwc->maximum_speed = usb_get_maximum_speed(dev); >>>>> dwc->max_ssp_rate = usb_get_maximum_ssp_rate(dev); >>>>> dwc->dr_mode = usb_get_dr_mode(dev); >>>>> @@ -1325,6 +1333,11 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>> &tx_thr_num_pkt_prd); >>>>> device_property_read_u8(dev, "snps,tx-max-burst-prd", >>>>> &tx_max_burst_prd); >>>>> + dwc->do_fifo_resize = device_property_read_bool(dev, >>>>> + "tx-fifo-resize"); >>>>> + if (dwc->do_fifo_resize) >>>>> + device_property_read_u8(dev, "tx-fifo-max-num", >>>>> + &tx_fifo_resize_max_num); >>>> >>>> Why is this check here? The dwc->tx_fifo_resize_max_num should store >>>> whatever property the user sets. Whether the driver wants to use this >>> >>> Ack! >>> >>>> property should depend on "dwc->do_fifo_resize". Also why don't we have >>>> "snps," prefix to be consistent with the other properties? >>> >>> Ack! >>> >>>> Can we enforce to a single property? If the designer wants to enable >>>> this feature, he/she can to provide the tx-fifo-max-num. This would >>>> simplify the driver a bit. Since this is to optimize for performance, >>>> the user should know/want/test the specific value if they want to set >>>> for their setup and not hoping that the default setting not break their >>>> setup. So we can remove the "do_fifo_resize" property and just check >>>> whether tx_fifo_resize_max_num is set. >>> >>> Ack! >>> >>> All very valid points :-) >>> Hi Thinh/Felipe, >> >> Looks like this series already landed in Greg's testing branch. Not sure >> how we usually handle this to address some of our concerns. Add fix >> patches on top of Greg's testing branch? > > yup, no choice anymore :-( > Let me review your feedback, which had some good points. We can add a change addressing everything on top of what is merged on Greg's branch. Thanks for all the input! Thanks Wesley Cheng -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project