Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210708180851.2311192-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210708180851.2311192-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210708180851.2311192-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:20:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ibgrdceoTqnbgbqHhCTZR74RuzKTDxVOzU2UR4VWJkGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] ACPI: CPPC: Fix doxygen comments
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc:     ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:09 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Clang complains about doxygen comments too with W=1 in the build.
>
>   | drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:560: warning: Function parameter or member
>   |     'pcc_ss_id' not described in 'pcc_data_alloc'
>   | drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1343: warning: Function parameter or member
>   |     'cpu_num' not described in 'cppc_get_transition_latency'
>
> Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index a4d4eebba1da..eb5685167d19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,8 @@ bool __weak cpc_ffh_supported(void)
>  /**
>   * pcc_data_alloc() - Allocate the pcc_data memory for pcc subspace
>   *

I would drop this empty line (and analogously below).

> + * @pcc_ss_id: PCC Subspace channel identifier
> + *
>   * Check and allocate the cppc_pcc_data memory.
>   * In some processor configurations it is possible that same subspace
>   * is shared between multiple CPUs. This is seen especially in CPUs
> @@ -1347,10 +1349,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_perf);
>  /**
>   * cppc_get_transition_latency - returns frequency transition latency in ns
>   *
> + * @cpu_num: Logical index of the CPU for which latencty is requested
> + *
>   * ACPI CPPC does not explicitly specify how a platform can specify the
>   * transition latency for performance change requests. The closest we have
>   * is the timing information from the PCCT tables which provides the info
>   * on the number and frequency of PCC commands the platform can handle.
> + *
> + * Returns: frequency transition latency on success or CPUFREQ_ETERNAL on
> + * failure

Is this change needed?  The one-line summary already says this.

>   */
>  unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu_num)
>  {
> --