Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:02:08 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
        pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
        kwankhede@nvidia.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
        imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: do not open code locks for
 VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification
Message-ID: <20210714130208.1eb5c677.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <9c50fb1b-4574-0cfc-487c-64108d97ed73@de.ibm.com>
References: <20210707154156.297139-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
        <20210713013815.57e8a8cb.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
        <5dd3cc05-f789-21a3-50c7-ee80d850a105@linux.ibm.com>
        <20210713184517.48eacee6.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
        <20210713170533.GF136586@nvidia.com>
        <9512a7fb-cc55-cd9b-cdf9-7c19d0567311@linux.ibm.com>
        <20210713192138.GG136586@nvidia.com>
        <dc18ff02-80f6-e59e-5f08-417434e74706@linux.ibm.com>
        <9c50fb1b-4574-0cfc-487c-64108d97ed73@de.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 19:56:42 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 14.07.21 15:25, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >   
> >> This patch shows it works as a rwsem - look at what had to be changed
> >> to make it so and you will find some clue to where the problems are in
> >> kvm_busy version.
> >>
> >> In any event, I don't care anymore - please just get this merged, to
> >> AlexW's tree so I don't have conflicts with the rest of the ap changes
> >> for VFIO I've got queued up.  
> > 
> > Christian, can you merge this with AlexW's tree? Halil suggested
> > the 'fixes' and 'cc stable' tags ought to be removed, do I need
> > to post another version or can you take those out when merging?  
> 
> Normally this would go via the KVM/s390 or s390 tree (as Alex did
> not want to handle s390 vfio devices).
> 
> Alex, as Jason is waiting for this to be in your tree could you take
> this patch via your tree ?(please remove cc stable and Fixes for now
> I want this to settle a bit).
> 
> To carry this patch in your tree with my kvm/s390 and s390 maintainer hat
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Is this intended for v5.14 or v5.15?  I don't have a v5.15 next branch
yet, so if this were to get into v5.14 before I create that, it'd be
there for Jason as well.  Posting a branch that we both merge into our
linux-next branches would be another option.  I can take it either way,
just trying to understand what we're wanting to achieve.  Thanks,

Alex