Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:59:21 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 024/108] ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Fix gpio
 function name for pads GPIO_[A-F]
Message-ID: <YO9QKRUOT0Kg0jZ9@sashalap>
References: <20210714193800.52097-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20210714193800.52097-24-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20210714203550.zlbvfh6rfnah6iir@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20210714203550.zlbvfh6rfnah6iir@pengutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:36:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit e0cdd26af8eb9001689a4cde4f72c61c1c4b06be ]
>>
>> The pinfunc definitions used GPIO_A as function instead of GPIO_1_0 as
>> done for all the other pins with GPIO functionality. Fix for consistency.
>>
>> There are no mainline users that needs adaption.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
>
>I'm not convinced it's a good idea to take this patch for stable.
>in-tree users are unaffected and the only effect this can have on
>out-of-tree users is to break them. So the gain of having this is not
>positive.
>
>Am I missing something?

Hm, if those definitions don't have an in-tree users, why are they still
around to begin with?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha