Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:50:32 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:     Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
Message-ID: <20210715095032.6897f1f6@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/r2jI.7wTppluivW9I5VE6nv";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/r2jI.7wTppluivW9I5VE6nv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

While compiling Linus' tree, a powerpc-allmodconfig build (and others)
with gcc 4.9 failed like this:

drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_netdev.c: In function 'ifh_enc=
ode_bitfield':
include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert=
_431' declared with attribute error: Unsupported width, must be <=3D 40
  _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
                                      ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:309:4: note: in definition of macro '__compi=
letime_assert'
    prefix ## suffix();    \
    ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compile=
time_assert'
  _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
  ^
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_netdev.c:28:2: note: in expans=
ion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
  compiletime_assert(width <=3D 40, "Unsupported width, must be <=3D 40");
  ^

Caused by commit

  f3cad2611a77 ("net: sparx5: add hostmode with phylink support")

I guess this is caused by the call to ifh_encode_bitfield() not being
inlined.


--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/r2jI.7wTppluivW9I5VE6nv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmDveEgACgkQAVBC80lX
0GwVUAgAiQDCnchrG4xRHyq7tAgVlXvSwS/XJHARhkuL8tFULxlc64XOTtiQ2MUH
D6uw7acPR0GZo6M57zghh3j9SopBVh4w6dJHwgCOL5omwsEs3hoe96ckJizGTjmU
x+TC90CeQJX/NELLFFvyrhSI8lC1e4u7UbF+Yfg8nEJ2kDDYAhSgu83uMM7jwV/Y
T/ZxayQnS20hGAxGUfMJBmDS41tH+FO03NUpEuF/XyY4DrBbdfxDUg7wUvAsTk0s
x8w7Pru61FjKogwHNwRq5mrbOaEIr1bFtSHz7Fp12lzvZIjYaLJ6Bv91eeCeE5V1
Cu8i+z3o9Q1rwBPVKAZ4AiM+xeyiKQ==
=S897
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/r2jI.7wTppluivW9I5VE6nv--