Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755327AbWKRTH3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:07:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755330AbWKRTH2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:07:28 -0500 Received: from [87.69.65.201] ([87.69.65.201]:40874 "EHLO psybear.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755322AbWKRTH1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:07:27 -0500 From: Dror Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: boot from efi on x86_64 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611182107.03667.spatz@psybear.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 844 Lines: 18 looking at the kernel source, after constant failures to boot linux on a core 2 imac, has made me understand that only i386 and ia64 support efi booting, but x86_64 does not. it makes sense, if you think about it... AFAIK, until the new core 2 imacs were out there was no x86_64 efi pc, so why should the kernel support it? i would like to ask that the efi boot code be ported to x86_64 and so people would not have to use boot camp and bios emulation to boot linux on new imacs. thank you for your time and help. P.S. i'm not currently subscribed to the lkml, so please CC me when you reply. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/