Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:40:13 +0100
From: Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu@irc.pl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: boot from efi on x86_64
Message-ID: <20061118204013.GA13645@irc.pl>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200611182107.03667.spatz@psybear.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200611182107.03667.spatz@psybear.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1428
Lines: 43


--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 09:07:03PM +0200, Dror Levin wrote:
> looking at the kernel source, after constant failures to boot linux on a =
core=20
> 2 imac, has made me understand that only i386 and ia64 support efi bootin=
g,=20
> but x86_64 does not.
> it makes sense, if you think about it... AFAIK, until the new core 2 imac=
s=20
> were out there was no x86_64 efi pc, so why should the kernel support it?

  Few days ago I played with Intel servers with EM64T Xeons (NetBurst
based). They are x86_64, and motherboard (Intel chipset) utilised EFI.

--=20
Tomasz Torcz               "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl    wagon filled with backup tapes." -- Jim Gray


--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: gpg --search-keys Tomasz Torcz

iD8DBQFFX2+t10UJr+75NrkRAksTAJ49IUE0/mB+vbDII531xRnhJTl/8ACfW80B
5AphRmB9g58kzWzLa/zfoI4=
=fMW5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/